Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39103869›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2024

Farmers' knowledge in the Swiss canton Valais: cultural heritage with future significance for European veterinary medicine?

Laura Arcangela Holzner, Matthias Hamburger, Maja Dal Cero, Ariane Maeschli, Christian R Vogl, Beat Meier, Michael Walkenhorst, Theresa Schlittenlacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura Arcangela HolznerPharmaceutical Biology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Matthias HamburgerPharmaceutical Biology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Maja Dal CeroDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ariane MaeschliDepartment of Livestock Science, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Ackerstrasse 113, Postbox 219, 5070, Frick, Switzerland.
Christian R VoglDivision of Organic Farming, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
Beat MeierUnit of Phytopharmacy and Natural Product Research, Institute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Michael WalkenhorstDepartment of Livestock Science, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Ackerstrasse 113, Postbox 219, 5070, Frick, Switzerland.
Theresa SchlittenlacherDepartment of Livestock Science, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Ackerstrasse 113, Postbox 219, 5070, Frick, Switzerland. theresa.schlittenlacher@fibl.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe demand for natural product-based treatment options for livestock is increasing by animals' owners, veterinarians and policy makers. But at the same time, the traditional knowledge about it is at risk of falling into oblivion in Europe. The present study recorded this knowledge for the linguistically and geographically interesting Swiss canton of Valais.

methodOpen, semi-structured interviews were used to collect detailed information on formulations and applications, including plant species and natural substances, origin of material, extraction and preparation of herbal products, indication and type of application, dosage, sources of knowledge, frequency of usage and self-assessment of the treatment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the course of 43 interviews, 173 homemade single species herbal remedy report (HSHR) were recorded. They included 53 plant species from 30 botanical families. Plant species from the botanical families of Asteraceae, Rubiaceae and Cupressaceae were mentioned the most, while the most frequently documented plant species were Coffea arabica L., Juniperus sabina L., Arnica montana L. and Matricaria chamomilla L. For the 173 HSHR, a total of 215 uses were mentioned, most of which were for the treatment of gastrointestinal and metabolic disorders, followed by skin lesions and genito-urinary tract problems. Regional peculiarities emerged, such as the use of Leontopodium alpinum Cass. for diarrhea in the French-speaking Valais, while Matricaria chamomilla and Camellia sinensis L. were used in the German-speaking part instead. In comparison with other regions of Switzerland, 10 plants were reported for the first time, including Juniperus sabina with 18 use reports.

conclusionThe daily use on farms and the high satisfaction of farmers with homemade herbal remedies demonstrate their high practical relevance. In conclusion, the traditional regional knowledge about the use of medicinal plants is not only a cultural heritage worth protecting, but also an essential resource for the further development of European veterinary medicine.

Indexed as

FarmersPlants, MedicinalVeterinary MedicineAdultAnimalsEthnobotanyFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKnowledgeMaleMiddle AgedPhytotherapySwitzerlandEthnoveterinary researchLivestock diseasesMedicinal plantsSwitzerland (Valais)

Identifiers

PMID39103869
PMCPMC11301829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.