Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39103852›Full record

SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2024

Predictive ability of hypotension prediction index and machine learning methods in intraoperative hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ida Mohammadi, Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi, Melika Hosseinpour, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Roozbeh Tavanaei, Amirreza Izadi, Sam Zeraatian-Nejad, Foolad Eghbali

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. From innovation to implementation: Addressing the AI adoption gap in cardiac surgery.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ida MohammadiCardiovascular Surgery Research and Development Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, 14665-354, Iran.
Shahryar Rajai FirouzabadiCardiovascular Surgery Research and Development Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, 14665-354, Iran.
Melika HosseinpourCardiovascular Surgery Research and Development Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, 14665-354, Iran.
Mohammadhosein AkhlaghpasandCardiovascular Surgery Research and Development Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, 14665-354, Iran. Akhlaghpasandm@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7514-5931
Bardia HajikarimlooCardiovascular Surgery Research and Development Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, 14665-354, Iran.
Roozbeh TavanaeiCardiovascular Surgery Research and Development Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, 14665-354, Iran.
Amirreza IzadiDepartment of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sam Zeraatian-NejadCardiovascular Surgery Research and Development Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, 14665-354, Iran.
Foolad EghbaliDepartment of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntraoperative Hypotension (IOH) poses a substantial risk during surgical procedures. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in predicting IOH holds promise for enhancing detection capabilities, providing an opportunity to improve patient outcomes. This systematic review and meta analysis explores the intersection of AI and IOH prediction, addressing the crucial need for effective monitoring in surgical settings.

methodA search of Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted. Screening involved two-phase assessments by independent reviewers, ensuring adherence to predefined PICOS criteria. Included studies focused on AI models predicting IOH in any type of surgery. Due to the high number of studies evaluating the hypotension prediction index (HPI), we conducted two sets of meta-analyses: one involving the HPI studies and one including non-HPI studies. In the HPI studies the following outcomes were analyzed: cumulative duration of IOH per patient, time weighted average of mean arterial pressure < 65 (TWA-MAP < 65), area under the threshold of mean arterial pressure (AUT-MAP), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC). In the non-HPI studies, we examined the pooled AUROC of all AI models other than HPI.

results43 studies were included in this review. Studies showed significant reduction in IOH duration, TWA-MAP < 65 mmHg, and AUT-MAP < 65 mmHg in groups where HPI was used. AUROC for HPI algorithms demonstrated strong predictive performance (AUROC = 0.89, 95CI). Non-HPI models had a pooled AUROC of 0.79 (95CI: 0.74, 0.83).

conclusionHPI demonstrated excellent ability to predict hypotensive episodes and hence reduce the duration of hypotension. Other AI models, particularly those based on deep learning methods, also indicated a great ability to predict IOH, while their capacity to reduce IOH-related indices such as duration remains unclear.

Indexed as

HypotensionMachine LearningHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsROC CurveAnesthesiaArtificial intelligenceDeep learningIntraoperative hypotensionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39103852
PMCPMC11302102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.