Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39103793›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Evaluation study of the urban governance of the COVID-19 crisis in the city of Antwerp.

Margot Bracke, Jil Molenaar, Annelies Colliers, Bruno Marchal, Daan Sanders, Sara Van Belle, Lore Van Praag, Josefien van Olmen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Margot BrackeCentre for Population, Family and Health, Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. margot.bracke@uantwerpen.be.
Jil MolenaarPrimary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp (ELIZA), Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Annelies ColliersPrimary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp (ELIZA), Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bruno MarchalDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Daan SandersHealth Service, Department of Social Affairs, City of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sara Van BelleDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Lore Van PraagGovernance and Pluralism, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Josefien van OlmenPrimary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp (ELIZA), Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1221821N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has demanded crisis management at all governance levels. While most research has focused on responses of national governments, city-level governance had significant potential to develop tailored approaches. This study explored how the local COVID-19 response was organised and adapted to the specific city population and context in the City of Antwerp, Belgium.

methodsA case study using semi-structured interviews was set up with 20 key informants with a central role in the coordination and implementation of the city-level COVID-19 response in Antwerp. Thematic analysis of transcripts was guided by an adapted version of the OECD risk management cycle.

resultsRespondents' accounts provide a granular understanding of pandemic preparedness, crisis management, and response and adaptation to the COVID-19 crisis in a mid-size European city. Its size was large enough to have a strong capacity within its government bodies, to utilise the expertise of strong partners in the area and to mobilise a critical mass for action, yet small enough to quickly establish connections and trust. In addition to a universal approach, they developed tailored responses to specific neighbourhoods and groups. Well-established community and organisational ties enhanced the effectiveness of grassroots initiatives. The perceived feeling of joint action contributed to a strong collective agency, but respondents noted the need for a system for monitoring and learning.

conclusionsLocal governments are important to develop tailored strategies and organise a locally relevant crisis response in cities. They need expertise and agency, with enough flexibility to experiment. To harness promising practices and avoid repeating errors in future crises, it is crucial to develop a system that better evaluates and monitors local responses, before, during and after crises.

Indexed as

CitiesCOVID-19BelgiumHumansInterviews as TopicLocal GovernmentPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 pandemicCrisisLocal governmentPrimary care zoneRisk management cycleUrban governance

Identifiers

PMID39103793
PMCPMC11302320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.