Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39103787›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024

Impact of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification on hip fracture surgery outcomes: insights from a retrospective analysis.

Lou'i Al-Husinat, Saif Azzam, Sarah Al Sharie, Laith Al Hseinat, Mohammad Araydah, Zaid Al Modanat, Ala Riyad Balawi, Ahmed Haroun, Adel Alsharei, Saif Gharaibeh and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lou'i Al-HusinatDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan. loui.husinat@yu.edu.jo.
Saif AzzamFaculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan.
Sarah Al SharieFaculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan.
Laith Al HseinatDepartment of Orthopaedics, Royal Medical Services, Amman, 11855, Jordan.
Mohammad AraydahDepartment of Internal Medicine, Istishari Hospital, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Zaid Al ModanatDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan.
Ala Riyad BalawiAlamal Maternity Hospital, Amman, 11194, Jordan.
Ahmed HarounAnesthesia Department, Albashir Hospitals, Ministry of Health, Amman, 11151, Jordan.
Adel AlshareiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan.
Saif GharaibehDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, 19117, Jordan.
Ahmed AlzoubiEmergency Department, Rosary Hospital, Irbid, 21163, Jordan.
Silvia De RosaCentre for Medical Sciences - CISMed, University of Trento, 38122, Trento, Italy.
Denise BattagliniAnesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification is the most used system to assess patient health status before surgery, ranging from I to V levels. This study aims to explore the impact of different ASA risk classes (ASA II [mild risk] and ASA III [severe risk]) on clinical outcomes following hip fracture surgery, including all-cause mortality and postoperative complications.

methodsA retrospective analysis from 2019 to 2021 across three Jordanian centers was conducted. The study included patients aged 65 and above who underwent hip fracture repair surgeries. Preoperative measures, intraoperative management protocols, and postoperative care were collected. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records, including demographics, fracture type, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes.

resultsThe analysis included 1033 patients, with 501 (48.5%) in the mild anesthetic risk group (ASA I-II) and 532 (51.5%) in the severe anesthetic risk group (ASA III-V). The mean age was 73 years, with a higher prevalence of males in the severe risk group. Patients in the severe risk group had more comorbidities, higher ICU admissions (15.23% vs. 6.18%), longer hospital stays (median 7 vs. 6 days), and higher rates of postoperative thromboembolic complications (3.39% vs. 1.39%) compared to the mild risk group. Additionally, the severe risk group showed higher mortality rates both in-hospital mortality (3.38% vs. 1.39%) and all-cause mortality (16.92% vs. 10.36%). Multivariate analysis identified higher ASA score as independent risk factors for increased all-cause mortality (HR = 1.64 95%CI 1.51-2.34) and thromboembolic complications (OR = 2.85 95%CI 1.16-7). Length of hospital stay was significantly associated with higher ASA score (OR = 1.04 95%CI 0.96-1.11).

conclusionThe study underscores the significant impact of anesthetic risk on the outcomes of hip fracture surgeries. Patients with higher ASA scores associated with severe systemic diseases may have at increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesiologistsFemaleHumansJordanLength of StayMaleRetrospective StudiesSocieties, MedicalTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAnesthetic riskASA classificationElderly populationHip fracture surgeryOutcome disparitiesPostoperative complicationsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID39103787
PMCPMC11299364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.