Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39103672›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2024

Assessing Participants' Experiences with Vitiligo from Patient Interviews.

Amit G Pandya, Theresa Amoloja, Kristen Bibeau, Dana DiBenedetti, Katherine Kosa, Kathleen Butler, Deanna Kornacki, Khaled Ezzedine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amit G PandyaPalo Alto Foundation Medical Group, Suunyvale, CA, USA. amit.pandya@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3916-2651
Theresa AmolojaIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9629-1891
Kristen BibeauIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6871-2333
Dana DiBenedettiPatient-Centered Outcomes Assessment, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-9519
Katherine KosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Assessment, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-527X
Kathleen ButlerIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6907-0846
Deanna KornackiIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6286-2069
Khaled EzzedineHenri Mondor University Hospital and Université Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-4589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVitiligo is an autoimmune disease, causing skin depigmentation. Individuals with vitiligo incur substantial psychosocial burden and have expressed frustration with their treatments. Here, we describe the burden of vitiligo and opinions on what constitutes meaningful change among participants of two qualitative interview studies.

methodsQualitative interviews were conducted with a subgroup of adolescent and adult participants with vitiligo from two pivotal phase 3 clinical trials of ruxolitinib cream (Study 1) and a real-world panel (Study 2). Participants were asked about their disease burden, treatment goals, importance of facial/body improvement (treatment satisfaction: scale range 0-10), and meaningfulness of change (yes/no).

resultsA total of 36 participants from Study 1 and 23 from Study 2 were interviewed. In Study 1, the highest degree of impact was on reduced self-esteem (facial lesions, 62.5%; body lesions, 55.6%), social inhibition (facial lesions, 65.6%; body lesions, 61.1%), and sun sensitivity (facial lesions, 31.3%; body lesions, 55.6%). Most participants (83.3%) reported that facial improvement was equally (36.1%) or more important (47.2%) than body improvement, with mean treatment satisfaction of 8.1 and 6.9, respectively. Meaningful change was reported by 83.3% and 92.9% of participants with 50-74% and ≥ 75% improvement per the facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index, respectively, and by 82.6% of participants with ≥ 25% improvement per the total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index per Study 1 outcomes at Week 24. In Study 2, most (82.6%) participants felt that the noticeability of their vitiligo affected their behavior. Nearly all (87.0%) said that an ideal treatment would repigment or return natural color to their facial skin; 56.5% considered ≥ 50% facial repigmentation to be the smallest meaningful improvement.

conclusionsParticipants from both qualitative interviews expressed substantial psychosocial burden. Repigmentation in both facial and body vitiligo were important, with meaningful change determined to be ≥ 50% facial repigmentation and ≥ 25% body repigmentation.

Indexed as

Disease burdenPsychosocial burdenQualitative interviewRepigmentationVitiligo

Identifiers

PMID39103672
PMCPMC11393220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.