ReviewCardiovascular engineering and technology2024
A Pseudo-Spectral Method for Wall Shear Stress Estimation from Doppler Ultrasound Imaging in Coronary Arteries.
Review in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forward-Viewing Intravascular Ultrasound: Design and Fabrication for High Sensitivity 3D Imaging of Hemodynamics.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Intravascular ultrasound wall shear stress imaging in stented coronary arteries with ultrafast Doppler.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic Coronary Blood Flow Velocity and Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Ultrasound in an Ex Vivo Porcine Heart.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Wall Shear Stress (WSS) is the component tangential to the boundary of the normal stress tensor in an incompressible fluid, and it has been recognized as a quantity of primary importance in predicting possible adverse events in cardiovascular diseases, in general, and in coronary diseases, in particular. The quantification of the WSS in patient-specific settings can be achieved by performing a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis based on patient geometry, or it can be retrieved by a numerical approximation based on blood flow velocity data, e.g., ultrasound (US) Doppler measurements. This paper presents a novel method for WSS quantification from 2D vector Doppler measurements.
methodsImages were obtained through unfocused plane waves and transverse oscillation to acquire both in-plane velocity components. These velocity components were processed using pseudo-spectral differentiation techniques based on Fourier approximations of the derivatives to compute the WSS.
resultsOur Pseudo-Spectral Method (PSM) is tested in two vessel phantoms, straight and stenotic, where a steady flow of 15 mL/min is applied. The method is successfully validated against CFD simulations and compared against current techniques based on the assumption of a parabolic velocity profile. The PSM accurately detected Wall Shear Stress (WSS) variations in geometries differing from straight cylinders, and is less sensitive to measurement noise. In particular, when using synthetic data (noise free, e.g., generated by CFD) on cylindrical geometries, the Poiseuille-based methods and PSM have comparable accuracy; on the contrary, when using the data retrieved from US measures, the average error of the WSS obtained with the PSM turned out to be 3 to 9 times smaller than that obtained by state-of-the-art methods.
conclusionThe pseudo-spectral approach allows controlling the approximation errors in the presence of noisy data. This gives a more accurate alternative to the present standard and a less computationally expensive choice compared to CFD, which also requires high-quality data to reconstruct the vessel geometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.