ArticlePediatric research2025
Slow rewarming after hypothermia does not ameliorate white matter injury after hypoxia-ischemia in near-term fetal sheep.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Evidence and Knowledge Gap Analysis With Treatment Recommendations.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2025Pooled it
- RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Clinical Guidelines.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2025Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal rate to rewarm infants after therapeutic hypothermia is unclear. In this study we examined whether slow rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia would attenuate white matter injury.
methodsNear-term fetal sheep received sham occlusion (n = 8) or cerebral ischemia for 30 min, followed by normothermia (n = 7) or hypothermia from 3-72 h, with either spontaneous fast rewarming (n = 8) within 1 h, or slow rewarming at ~0.5 °C/h (n = 8) over 10 h. Fetuses were euthanized 7 days later.
resultsIschemia was associated with loss of total and mature oligodendrocytes, reduced expression of myelin proteins and induction of microglia and astrocytes, compared with sham controls (P < 0.05). Both hypothermia protocols were associated with a significant increase in numbers of total and mature oligodendrocytes, area fraction of myelin proteins and reduced numbers of microglia and astrocytes, compared with ischemia-normothermia (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the number of oligodendrocytes, microglia or astrocytes or expression of myelin proteins between fast and slow rewarming after hypothermia.
conclusionThe rate of rewarming after a clinically relevant duration of hypothermia had no apparent effect on white matter protection by hypothermia after cerebral ischemia in near-term fetal sheep. IMPACT: Persistent white matter injury is a major contributor to long-term disability after neonatal encephalopathy despite treatment with therapeutic hypothermia. The optimal rate to rewarm infants after therapeutic hypothermia is unclear; current protocols were developed on a precautionary basis. We now show that slow rewarming at 0.5 °C/h did not improve histological white matter injury compared with rapid spontaneous rewarming after a clinically established duration of hypothermia in near-term fetal sheep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.