ArticleNature human behaviour2024
Moving beyond processing- and analysis-related variation in resting-state functional brain imaging.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- White matter signatures of addiction diverge across opioids, cannabis and nicotine and predict impulsive choice in cannabis dependence.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Intrinsic timescale develops hierarchically from sensorimotor to association cortex in youth and stabilizes in adulthood.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Enhancing reproducibility in neuroimaging with containerized archival.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- A longitudinal resource for mapping interindividual variation in the aging connectome.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Brainana: an end-to-end preprocessing framework for macaque neuroimaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From topography to connectome: Towards an integrated understanding of the resting brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Symptom-specific links between internalizing problems and functional connectivity in adolescents: a network analysis.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: Translating fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging insights into clinical practice.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Task and Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modeling of Brain-Behavior Relationships in Developmental Cohorts.Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
- Benchmarking resting state fMRI connectivity pipelines for classification: robust accuracy despite processing variability in cross-site eye state prediction.Brain informatics · 2026Article
- Normative Modeling of Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- An international mega-analysis of psychedelic drug effects on brain circuit function.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Prefrontal-centered cortical alterations and network dysconnectivity in cocaine use disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- An evaluation of the efficacy of single-echo and multi-echo fMRI denoising strategies.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Transdiagnostic similarities and distinctions in brain networks associated with autistic social impairments: a prospective cohort study.Molecular autism · 2025Article
- Article
- An open, longitudinal resource for mapping interindividual variation in the aging connectome.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Spatial Frequency Maps in Human Visual Cortex: A Replication and Extension.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- HCP Multi-Pipeline: a derived dataset to investigate analytical variability in fMRI.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When fields lack consensus standard methods and accessible ground truths, reproducibility can be more of an ideal than a reality. Such has been the case for functional neuroimaging, where there exists a sprawling space of tools and processing pipelines. We provide a critical evaluation of the impact of differences across five independently developed minimal preprocessing pipelines for functional magnetic resonance imaging. We show that, even when handling identical data, interpipeline agreement was only moderate, critically shedding light on a factor that limits cross-study reproducibility. We show that low interpipeline agreement can go unrecognized until the reliability of the underlying data is high, which is increasingly the case as the field progresses. Crucially we show that, when interpipeline agreement is compromised, so too is the consistency of insights from brain-wide association studies. We highlight the importance of comparing analytic configurations, because both widely discussed and commonly overlooked decisions can lead to marked variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39103610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.