ArticleUrologia internationalis2024
Initial Experience with an Absorbable Urologic Scaffold to Mitigate Early Urinary Incontinence following Radical Prostatectomy: A Report of 2 Cases.
Article in Urologia internationalis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Initial results with an absorbable urologic scaffold to mitigate early urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy: the ARID study.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a frequent, known complication following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer. Urethral shortening and reduced urethral support following RARP are contributing factors. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Herein, we describe a surgical approach using a novel absorbable urologic scaffold to mitigate SUI in 2 patients enrolled in an ongoing single-arm prospective study. The scaffold is designed to relieve the burden on the urinary sphincter by lengthening the effective urethra following RARP. The scaffold is placed at the anastomotic site, overlying the bladder neck and urethral stump following prostate removal and prior to the creation of the anastomosis. Both patients successfully underwent the prostatectomy and urologic scaffold placement with no reported perioperative complications. Neither patient suffered from early SUI following RARP as measured by pad weight and usage at 1 and 3 months following the procedure.
conclusionEarly experience with the absorbable urologic scaffold suggests it could safely and effectively prevent SUI following RARP. Early and long-term results derived from the ongoing prospective study with this device will better define its potential role in the prevention of SUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.