Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102738›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Patient partner perspectives on compensation: Insights from the Canadian Patient Partner Survey.

Roma Dhamanaskar, Laura Tripp, Meredith Vanstone, Carolyn Canfield, Mary Anne Levasseur, Julia Abelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patients as Partners in Perinatal Health Research: A Scoping Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  5. Consumers' Contribution to Health Research: Australian Research Organisations' Perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Recognising Consumers' Contributions to Health Research: Co-Designing a Remuneration Framework for the Australian Context.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Involving Knowledge Users in Health Services Research: Collective Reflections and Learning From a National Evaluation of Recurrent Miscarriage Services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient partner perspectives on compensation: Insights from the Canadian Patient Partner Survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roma DhamanaskarHealth Policy PhD Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5565-8465
Laura TrippPublic and Patient Engagement Collaborative, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6108-9190
Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-6259
Carolyn CanfieldPatient Advisors Network, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2976-2231
Mary Anne LevasseurPatient Advisors Network, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3778-813X
Julia AbelsonPublic and Patient Engagement Collaborative, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-2783

Funding

CIHR 165883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a growing role for patients, family members and caregivers as consultants, collaborators and partners in health system settings in Canada. However, compensation for this role is not systematized. When offered, it varies in both type (e.g., one-time honorarium, salary) and amount. Further, broad-based views of patient partners on compensation are still unknown. We aimed to describe the types and frequency of compensation patient partners have been offered and their attitudes towards compensation.

methodsThis study uses data from the Canadian Patient Partner Study (CPPS) survey. The survey gathered the experiences and perspectives of those who self-identified as patient partners working across the Canadian health system. Three questions were about compensation, asking what types of compensation participants had been offered, if they had ever refused compensation, and whether they felt adequately compensated. The latter two questions included open-text comments in addition to menu-based and scaled response options. Basic frequencies were performed for all questions and open-text comments were analyzed through inductive qualitative content analysis.

resultsA total of 603 individuals participated in the CPPS survey. Most respondents were never or rarely offered salary (81%), honorarium (64%), gift cards (80%) or material gifts (93%) while half were offered conference registration and expenses at least sometimes. A total of 129 (26%) of 499 respondents reported refusing compensation. Of 511 respondents, half felt adequately compensated always or often, and half only sometimes, rarely or never. Open-text comments revealed positive, ambivalent and negative attitudes towards compensation. Attitudes were framed by perceptions about their role, sentiments of giving back to the health system, feelings of acknowledgement, practical considerations, values of fairness and equity and accountability relationships.

conclusionsOur findings confirm that compensation is not standardized in Canada. Half of survey respondents routinely feel inadequately compensated. Patient partners have diverse views of what constitutes adequate compensation inclusive of personal considerations such as a preference for volunteering, and broader concerns such as promoting equity in patient partnership. Organizations should attempt to ensure that compensation practices are clear, transparent and attentive to patient partners' unique contexts. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Two patient partners are members of the CPPS research team and have been fully engaged in all study phases from project conception to knowledge translation. They are co-authors of this manuscript. The survey was co-designed and pilot tested with patient partners and survey participants were patient partners.

Indexed as

CaregiversAdultAgedCanadaCompensation and RedressFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSalaries and Fringe BenefitsSurveys and Questionnairescompensationhealthcarehealth policypatient engagementpatient involvementpatient partnership

Identifiers

PMID39102738
PMCPMC10790107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.