Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102697›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

'Keeping it real': A qualitative exploration of preferences of people with lived experience for participation and active involvement in mental health research in Australia.

Julia Dray, Victoria J Palmer, Michelle Banfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Developing Best Practices in Co-Production With Lived Experience Experts in Bipolar Research: Insights From the AMBIENT-BD Lived Experience Advisory Panel.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Co-Design With Mothers and Professionals to Enhance Care for Mothers Experiencing Adversity: Development of the METIC Model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Co-Production With Mental Health Family Carers: The Value, Outcomes and Benefits for Family Carers and Academic Researchers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Coproduced Youth Priorities Project: Australian Youth Priorities for Mental Health and Substance Use Prevention Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia DrayCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4613-2634
Victoria J PalmerThe ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The University of Melbourne, The Australian National University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7212-932X
Michelle BanfieldCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Funding

ACT Government for ACACIA: The ACT Consumer and Carer Mental Health Research UnitMedical Research Council GNT2002047National Disability Research Partnership, Australian Department of Social Services, Australian GovernmentNational Health and Medical Research Council Special Initiative in Mental Health for The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation GNT2002047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, researchers have been apt at conducting research on, rather than with, the people who are the focus of their efforts. Such approaches often fail to effectively support and benefit the populations they are intended to. This study aimed to explore the preferences of people with lived experience for engagement with research either as research participants within studies, or through active involvement in mental health research.

methodsData for this paper were collected in three separate lived experience agenda-setting studies conducted over a 9-year period from 2013 to 2022; two group discussions and an open-ended online survey. Data were combined and thematic analysis undertaken.

resultsParticipants described the inclusion of lived experience as a critical ingredient and the highest level of knowledge and expertise in mental health research that should lead to knowledge generation and research agendas. Participants discussed the importance and value of research that enables sharing experiences and stories, expressed a need for flexibility in research methods for choice and agency, and support for greater active involvement of people with lived experience across all stages of research. Participants also spoke to the need for perspective and knowledge generated from people with lived experience to have equal power in research, making space for lived experience voices across multiple aspects of research, and greater respect and recognition of the value of lived experience.

conclusionLived experience in mental health research is coming of age, but dedicated, cocreated development is needed to get it right. People with lived experience increasingly understand the value their experiential knowledge brings to the mental health research effort, and describe a wide range of ways that researchers can support them to be research participants, and to get actively involved. Power-sharing, respect and recognition of lived experience as central to effective mental health research are the keys to 'keeping it real'. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with lived experience of mental health problems or distress either personally, and/or as carers, family and kinship group members, were involved in the coideation and codesign of this research. All authors identify as people with lived experience.

Indexed as

Mental HealthQualitative ResearchAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPatient PreferenceResearch SubjectsSurveys and Questionnairesinvolvementlived experiencequalitative research methodsresearch participation

Identifiers

PMID39102697
PMCPMC10775820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.