Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102689›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Parenting through place-of-care disruptions: A qualitative study of parents' experiences of neonatal care.

Caroline Cupit, Alexis Paton, Elaine Boyle, Thillagavathie Pillay, Josie Anderson, Natalie Armstrong, OPTI‐PREM team

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02994849 (OPTI-Prem), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02994849 completednot on this map

OPTI-Prem: Optimising Neonatal Service Provision for Preterm Babies Born Between 27 and 31 Weeks of Gestation in England Using National Data, Qualitative Research and Economic Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS TrustRan2017 to 2022Enrolled4,364ConditionsNeonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Parenting through place-of-care disruptions: A qualitative study of parents' experiences of neonatal care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline CupitDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3377-8471
Alexis PatonCentre for Health and Society, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4310-6983
Elaine BoyleDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Thillagavathie PillayResearch Institute for Health Related Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.
Josie AndersonBLISS, London, UK.
Natalie ArmstrongDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
OPTI‐PREM team

Funding

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme 15/70/104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeonatal care is complex, involving multiple people and technologies within a community of care. When preterm babies are cared for far from home and/or transferred between units, the whole community of care (and particularly parent participation) is disrupted. Although previous studies have captured subjective experiences of parents, there has been little research exploring the material practices undertaken by parents as a consequence of place-of-care decisions, or the social organisation of those practices.

methodsAs part of a wider study exploring optimal place-of-care, semistructured interviews were conducted between July 2018 and October 2019 with 48 parents (36 families) with one or more preterm babies (born at 27-31 weeks gestation) cared for in a neonatal unit in the last 12 months.

findingsWe highlight parents' labour-intensive and stressful work to: (1) parent in the neonatal care community (an oversight role that goes beyond contemporary notions of 'involvement'); (2) create continuity amid place-of-care disruptions; and (3) adapt to the managerial logics of neonatal care settings. Our analysis focuses on the work generated by managerial systems that organise place-of-care decision-making and other efficiency-focused practices. Parents are absorbed into negotiating institutional systems and diverted from routine parenting activities.

conclusionThose involved in the organisation and management of neonatal care should take account of how managerial systems impact parents' workload, ability to participate in their baby's community of care and, ultimately, on the wellbeing and development of babies and their families. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The OPTI-PREM study embedded parents' experiences of neonatal care into the research, through a discrete workstream that employed qualitative methodology to capture parents' experiences-as reported in this paper. The OPTI-PREM project was also supported by a Bliss volunteer parent panel, which was involved in designing and overseeing the research. Bliss 'champion[s] the right for every baby born premature or sick to receive the best care by supporting families, campaigning for change and supporting professionals and enabling life-changing research' (https://www.bliss.org.uk/about-us/about-bliss). A representative of Bliss is a co-author of this manuscript, and a parent representative (named in the Acknowledgements) provided feedback during its preparation.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureInterviews as TopicParentingParentsQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMalecommunity of caremanagementneonatal careparentingparent involvementpolicyqualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID39102689
PMCPMC10726285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.