Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102688›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Uncovering communication strategies used in language-discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers.

Brittany M C Chan, Jeanine Suurmond, Julia C M van Weert, Barbara C Schouten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Uncovering communication strategies used in language-discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brittany M C ChanDepartment of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Science (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6827-5332
Jeanine SuurmondDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julia C M van WeertDepartment of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Science (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Barbara C SchoutenDepartment of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Science (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 406.20.SW.024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal migration has led to a sharp increase in the number of language-discordant consultations (LDCs) in healthcare. Evidence on how healthcare providers (HCPs) meet migrant patients' needs while mitigating language barriers is lacking.

designUsing purposive and snowball sampling, we recruited twenty-seven Dutch HCPs (M

resultsFive key themes emerged from the analyses: HCPs often 'got-by' with (1) instrumental and (2) affective communication strategies used in language-concordant consultations to start medical consultations. When some instrumental communication strategies were deemed ineffective (e.g., lingua franca, gesturing, etc.) to bridge language barriers, HCPs turned to (3) incorporating digital tools (e.g., Google Translate). When HCPs were unable to communicate with migrant patients at all, (4) informal, ad-hoc and professional interpreters were involved. Finally, HCPs often (5) involved additional support to engage migrant patients to engage in treatment-related behaviours. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsOur results highlight the importance of raising awareness among HCPs about using various combinations of different strategies. The development of a guideline indicating the optimal combination of communication strategies for different medical consultation goals may be useful in reshaping the current communication behaviour of HCPs in LDCs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: HCPs were the study population involved in this qualitative study. Refugee health advisors, general practitioners and linguistic specialists (i.e., members of the Right2Health consortium) with experience with the Dutch healthcare system were involved throughout the development of this research. This includes a review of the research question, participant information sheet and interview topic guide as well as providing interpretations of the data and feedback to this manuscript.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunication BarriersHealth PersonnelInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchTransients and MigrantsAdultFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPhysician-Patient RelationsReferral and Consultationcommunication strategieshealthcare providersinterpreterslanguage‐discordant consultationsmigrant patients

Identifiers

PMID39102688
PMCPMC10750019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.