Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102672›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Beyond 5-year survival. A report from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS).

Julia S Fernandes, Claudia Blattmann, Stefanie Hecker-Nolting, Leo Kager, Matthias Kevric, Vanessa Mettmann, Benjamin Sorg, Marc Fernandes, Stefan S Bielack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julia S FernandesPädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Stuttgart Cancer Center, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Claudia BlattmannPädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Stuttgart Cancer Center, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4045-5838
Stefanie Hecker-NoltingPädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Stuttgart Cancer Center, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1815-138X
Leo KagerSt. Anna Kinderspital, Universitätsklinik für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde der Medizinischen Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4954-6488
Matthias KevricPädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Stuttgart Cancer Center, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Vanessa MettmannPädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Stuttgart Cancer Center, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4460-8830
Benjamin SorgPädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Stuttgart Cancer Center, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Marc FernandesHochschule Aalen, Aalen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4494-6741
Stefan S BielackPädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Stuttgart Cancer Center, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2144-3153

Funding

Förderkreis krebskranke Kinder e. V. Stuttgart
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrognostic factors have been well described for osteosarcoma, but analyses evaluating the further course of long-term survivors are lacking. We used the large database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS) to perform such an analysis. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe COSS database 1980-04/2019 was searched for 5-year survivors of primary high-grade central osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk. Identified patients were analyzed for their further survival outcomes, assessing potentially prognostic and predictive factors already evident at initial disease presentation and treatment as well as their disease course during the first 5 years of follow-up.

resultsTwo thousand and nine former eligible patients were identified (median age at initial diagnosis 15.1 (2.5-63.0) years; male vs. female 1149 (57.2%) vs. 860 (42.8%); extremities vs. trunk 1927 (95.9%) vs. 82 (4.1%); extremity primaries <1/3 vs. ≥1/3 of the involved bone 997 (67.8%) vs. 474 (32.2%) (456 unknown); localized vs. primary metastatic 1881 (93.6%) vs. 128 (6.4%); osteosarcoma as a secondary malignancy 41/2009 (2.0%)). Therapy starting by chemotherapy versus primary surgery 1860 (92.6%) versus 149 (7.4%); definitive tumor surgery by limb salvage versus ablative 1347 (67.0%) versus 659 (1 no surgery, 2 unknown); tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy documented for 1765 (94.9%) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, good (<10% viable tumor) versus poor 1130 (64.0%) versus 635 (36.0%), local radiotherapy documented for 19 (0.9%) tumors. Recurrence during preceding 5 years no versus yes 1681 (83.7%) versus 328 (16.3%). Median follow-up starting 5 years after initial diagnosis 6.1 (0.002-32.2) years; 1815 survivors and 194 deaths. Overall survival after another 5/10/15/20 years 91.7%/88.9%/85.8%/83.4% for all patients; 97.5%/95.2%/92.4%/89.9% if in remission years 1-5 versus 62.7%/57.3%/53.0%/51.2% if recurrence year 1-5 (p < 0.001). Significant predictors of survival for all patients age at diagnosis (p = 0.038), tumor site (p = 0.030), having experienced the osteosarcoma as secondary malignancy (p < 0.001), tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression testing possible for 1759 (87.6%) patients with complete dataset: Having had a recurrence in years 1-5 (p < 0.001), older age at diagnosis (p = 0.009), and osteosarcoma as secondary malignancy (p = 0.013) retained significance. DISCUSSION: Highly important predictors of death such as the extent of tumor response to chemotherapy no longer remain valid after 5-year survival. The individual history of malignancies and their outcomes seems to gain pivotal importance.

conclusionThis benchmark analysis clearly defined risk factors for the further course of 5-year survivors from osteosarcoma. It argues for large disease-oriented databases as well as for very long follow-up periods. Novel findings will most likely require innovative statistical models to analyze such cohorts.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaAdolescentAdultCancer SurvivorsChildChild, PreschoolExtremitiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisYoung Adultosteosarcomapediatric cancerprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID39102672
PMCPMC10823757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.