SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024
Person-centred integrated care for people living with Parkinson's, Huntington's and Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Person-centred integrated care for people living with Parkinson's, Huntington's and Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning prediction of discharge destination in patients with Parkinson's disease; a nationwide cohort study.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Measuring patient experience of integrated care in multiple sclerosis: development and validation of the Integrated Care Experience Scale (ICES-MS).European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Co-Design of a New Integrated Care Model With People Affected by Huntington's Disease: A Mixed Methods Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Prediction of Discharge Destination in Patients with Parkinson's Disease; A Nationwide Cohort Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Methods of Engaging Interest-Holders in Healthcare Evidence Syntheses: A Scoping Review.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Review
- Making Room for Every Voice: Reimagining Person-Centred Care in the Neurosciences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Exploring Different Levels of Contact Frequency in Multiple Sclerosis Care.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Implementing proximity care for people with multiple sclerosis in Italy: the bottom-up approach of the StayHome project.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Management of Parkinson's in the Community: Interests and Expectations of People Living with Parkinson's, Family Carers, Healthcare Professionals and Stakeholders in Spain.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPeople living with long-term neurological conditions (LTNCs) have complex needs that demand intensive care coordination between sectors. This review aimed to establish if integrated care improves outcomes for people, and what characterises successful interventions.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was undertaken evaluating multisectoral integrated care interventions in people living with Parkinson's disease (PD), Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Huntington's disease (HD). Strength of evidence was rated for the different outcomes.
resultsA total of 15 articles were included, reporting on 2095 patients and caregivers, finding that integrated care can improve people's access to resources and reduce patients' depression. UK studies indicated improvements in patients' quality of life, although the international literature was inconclusive. Few programmes considered caregivers' outcomes, reporting no difference or even worsening in depression, burden and quality of life. Overall, the evidence showed a mismatch between people's needs and outcomes measured, with significant outcomes (e.g., self-management, continuity of care, care experience) lacking. Successful programmes were characterised by expert knowledge, multisectoral care coordination, care continuity and a person-centred approach.
conclusionsThe impact of integrated care programmes on people living with LTNCs is limited and inconclusive. For a more person-centred approach, future studies need to assess integrated care from a service-user perspective. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Thirty people living with LTNCs were involved in this review, through defining research questions, validating the importance of the project, and increasing the researchers' understanding on what matters to service users. A patient and public involvement subgroup of representatives with lived experience on PD, MS and HD identified the need for more person-centred integrated care, with specific concerns over care fragmentation, care duplication and care continuity. This was key to data analysis and formulating the characteristics of successful and unsuccessful integrated care programmes from the perspective of service users. The discrepancy between service users' needs and the outcomes assessed in the literature point to user-driven research as the solution to address what matters to patients and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.