Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102654›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Participant and caregiver perspectives on health feedback from a healthy lifestyle check.

Miranda D Lee, Cervantée E K Wild, Ken J Taiapa, Ngauru T Rawiri, Victoria Egli, Sarah E Maessen, Yvonne C Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Participant and caregiver perspectives on health feedback from a healthy lifestyle check.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miranda D LeeDepartment of Paediatrics, Te Whatu Ora Taranaki, New Plymouth, Taranaki, New Zealand.
Cervantée E K WildDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ken J TaiapaNgāti Porou, Rongowhakaata, Tangata3, New Zealand.
Ngauru T RawiriDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Victoria EgliSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sarah E MaessenDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Yvonne C AndersonDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2054-338X

Funding

Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust 3723881Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust and Performance Based Research Fund, University of AucklandUniversity of Auckland 71603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe usual output following health consultations from paediatric services is a clinical letter to the referring professional or primary care provider, with a copy sent to the patient's caregiver. There is little research on how patients and caregivers perceive the letter content. We aimed to: first understand child, young people and caregiver experiences of and preferences for receiving a health feedback letter about the child/young person's health measures within a healthy lifestyle programme; and second to provide a set of recommendations for designing letters to children, young people and their families within a healthy lifestyle programme.

methodsThis qualitative study, informed by Kaupapa Māori principles, included focus groups of children aged 5-11 years and young people aged 12-18 years who were participants in a healthy lifestyle programme in Taranaki, Aotearoa New Zealand and of their respective caregivers (total n = 47). Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

findingsKey themes were identified: letters sometimes acted as 'discourses of disempowerment'-some participants experienced a lack of safety, depersonalisation with medical jargon and 'feeling like a number'. Participants described the need for acknowledgement and affirmation in written communication-health feedback should include validation, choice regarding content, respectful tone and a strengths-based approach to health messages.

interpretationLetters to referrers, copied to families, can be perceived as disempowering, and participant and caregiver perspectives of content should be considered. This study challenges conventional practice in communicating health feedback with broader implications for written communication in healthcare. We propose separate letters aimed at the child/young person and their caregiver that offer choice in the information they receive. The administrative burden of multiple letters can be mitigated by advances in digital health. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: This study originated in response to feedback from service users that current health feedback was not meeting their needs or expectations. Patient perspectives, especially from children, are rarely considered in the generation of clinic letters from health professionals. Participants were child participants in the community-based clinical service and their caregivers, and care was taken to represent the demographic backgrounds of service users. Collection and interpretation of Māori data were led by researchers who were local community members to ensure prioritisation and preservation of participant voice. Where possible, results are illustrated in the text by direct quotes from participants, whose identities are protected with a pseudonym.

Indexed as

CaregiversFocus GroupsHealthy LifestyleQualitative ResearchAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCommunicationFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleNew Zealandchild health servicesconsumer health informationhealth communicationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39102654
PMCPMC10785704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.