Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102628›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024

Bevacizumab Erlotinib Switch Maintenance in Chemo-Responsive Advanced Gallbladder and Cholangiocarcinoma (BEER BTC): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase II Trial.

Anant Ramaswamy, Prabhat Bhargava, Sujay Srinivas, Akhil Kapoor, Bal Krishna Mishra, Anuj Gupta, Sarika Mandavkar, Sadhana Kannan, Deepali Chaugule, Rajshree Patil and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rethinking maintenance strategies in biliary tract cancers.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anant RamaswamyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8169-4264
Prabhat BhargavaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-2186
Sujay SrinivasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9981-364X
Akhil KapoorDepartment of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6006-2631
Bal Krishna MishraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi, India.
Anuj GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi, India.
Sarika MandavkarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Sadhana KannanDepartment of Statistics, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Deepali ChauguleCRC, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Rajshree PatilCRC, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Manali ParulekarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Chaitali NashikkarTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Suman Kumar AnkathiDepartment of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Rajiv Kumar KaushalDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0363-3287
Deepali NaughaneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Anuprita DaddiDepartment of Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Neha MerCRC, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Nitin ShettyDepartment of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Vikas OstwalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0067-4748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with chemotherapy-responsive advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are usually observed after 6 months of gemcitabine-based therapy. There is limited prospective evidence for maintenance strategies after chemotherapy.

methodsThis investigator-initiated, open-label, randomized, integrated phase II-III study enrolled adult patients with advanced BTC from two cancer centers in India. Patients with histologically confirmed advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma who had at least disease stabilization after 6 months of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to either active surveillance or switch maintenance, which was a combination of bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenous once every 21 days plus erlotinib 100 mg once daily. Both arms were continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient decision to withdraw. The primary end point of the phase II component of the trial was investigator-evaluated progression-free survival. This trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2019/05/019323I).

resultsFrom May 2021 to November 2022, 98 patients were randomly assigned to active surveillance (n = 49) or bevacizumab-erlotinib (n = 49). A majority of patients had gallbladder cancer (80%). The median follow-up was 13.4 months. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.47 to 3.64) in the active surveillance group versus 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.53 to 7.04) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group (hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0·74];

conclusionThe combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib as switch maintenance improves progression-free survival with an acceptable safety profile compared with active surveillance in patients with advanced BTCs in this phase II study. The trial moves on to the phase III component to evaluate improvement in overall survival.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCholangiocarcinomaErlotinib HydrochlorideGallbladder NeoplasmsGemcitabineAdultAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalBevacizumabDeoxycytidineErlotinib HydrochlorideGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID39102628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.