Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102624›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024

Outcomes With Postrecurrence Systemic Therapy Following Adjuvant Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Resected Melanoma in CheckMate 238.

Jeffrey Weber, Michele Del Vecchio, Mario Mandalá, Helen Gogas, Ana M Arance, Stephane Dalle, C Lance Cowey, Michael Schenker, Jean-Jacques Grob, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni and 16 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Braf-Mutant Melanomas: Biology and Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Jeffrey WeberLaura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-4962-2957
Michele Del VecchioUnit of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Mario MandaláPapa Giovanni XIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8846-8959
Helen GogasDepartment of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0451-2885
Ana M AranceDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Stephane DalleDepartment of Dermatology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.
C Lance CoweyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.
Michael SchenkerOncology Center Sf Nectarie, Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2645-6391
Jean-Jacques GrobDepartment of Dermatology, Aix-Marseille University, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0667-153X
Vanna Chiarion-SileniMelanoma Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9191-9124
Iván Márquez-RodasDepartment of Medical Oncology, General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón and CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2476-668X
Marcus O ButlerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Department of Immunology University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9840-7057
Anna Maria Di GiacomoCenter for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, University of Siena, Italy.
Luis de la Cruz-Merino4Department of Clinical Oncology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Hospital University Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5333-0535
Petr Arenberger5Department of Dermatology, Charles University Third Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4800-5877
Victoria Atkinson6Division of Cancer Services, Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Andrew Hill7Department of Medical Oncology, Tasman Health Care, Southport, QLD, Australia.
Leslie A Fecher8Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-6534-7457
Michael MillwardDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Western Australia and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1744-1617
Nikhil I Khushalani0Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-3636-4143
Paola Queirolo1Medical Oncology of Melanoma, Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Georgina V Long2Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-3545
Maurice Lobo3Oncology Clinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.ORCID 0009-0008-4674-6744
Margarita Askelson3Oncology Clinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Paolo A AsciertoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-475X
James LarkinDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5569-9523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn phase III CheckMate 238, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma without a significant difference in overall survival (OS). Here, we investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after postrecurrence systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients 15 years or older with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and tumor PD-L1 status and randomly assigned to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Patients with recurrence in each group were assessed for PFS and OS from subsequent systemic therapy (SST) initiation per recurrence timing (≤12 months [early]

resultsRecurrences occurred in 198 (44%) of 453 nivolumab-treated patients (122 early, 76 late) and 232 (51%) of 453 ipilimumab-treated patients (160 early, 72 late). Median PFS on next-line systemic therapy for nivolumab-treated patients recurring early versus late was 4.7 versus 12.4 months (24-month rates, 16%

conclusionPostrecurrence survival was longer for patients who recurred >12 months. Patients on nivolumab who recurred early benefitted from SST but had better survival with ipilimumab-based regimens or targeted therapy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabMelanomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNivolumabAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProgression-Free SurvivalSkin NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID39102624
PMCPMC11527380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.