Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102623›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2025

Re-Envisioning Electronic Health Records to Optimize Patient-Centered Cancer Care, Quality, Surveillance, and Research.

Aditi P Singh, Erin P Balogh, Robert W Carlson, Mary Margaret Huizinga, Bradley A Malin, Alexander Melamed, Neal J Meropol, Etta D Pisano, Robert A Winn, K Robin Yabroff and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Blockchain in Cancer Care: Toward Evidence-Based and Inclusive Practice.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Enhancing Cancer Care through Blockchain Technology.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aditi P SinghUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Erin P BaloghAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.
Robert W CarlsonNational Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-2011-6695
Mary Margaret HuizingaAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD.
Bradley A MalinVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-3040-5175
Alexander MelamedMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-0863
Neal J MeropolFlatiron Health, New York, NY.
Etta D PisanoAmerican College of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0529-7654
Robert A WinnMassey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-5948-9291
K Robin YabroffAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta GA.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-5572
Lawrence N ShulmanUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-8661-473X

Funding

Research ProgramP50CA244690 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BEIDAS, RINAD SARY · 2020 to 2024
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244690NIH HHS HHSN263201800029I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) are a significant advancement over paper records. However, the full potential of EHRs for improving care quality, patient outcomes, surveillance, and research in cancer care is yet to be realized. The organic evolution of EHRs has resulted in a number of unanticipated consequences including increased time spent by clinicians interfacing with the EHR for daily workflows. Patient access to clinicians and their records has been an important advancement in patient-centered care; however, this has brought to light additional gaps and challenges in EHRs meeting these needs. A significant challenge for EHR design and physician workflows is how best to meet the complex goals and priorities of various stakeholders including providers, researchers, patients, health systems, payors, and regulatory agencies. The National Cancer Policy Forum convened a 2022 workshop, "Innovations in Electronic Health Records for Oncology Care, Research and Surveillance," to address these challenges and to facilitate collaboration across all user groups with the goal of re-envisioning EHRs that will better support shared goals of improving patient outcomes and advancing cancer care and research without overburdening clinicians with administrative tasks. Here, we summarize the current EHR ecosystem as discussed at the workshop and highlight opportunities to improve EHR contributions to oncology evidence and care.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CareQuality of Health CareHumansMedical Oncology

Identifiers

PMID39102623
PMCPMC11834962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.