Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102534›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The neural basis of swap errors in working memory.

Matteo Alleman, Matthew Panichello, Timothy J Buschman, W Jeffrey Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Human Beta Oscillations Reflect Magnitude and Fidelity of Priority Shifts in Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The neural basis of swap errors in working memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matteo AllemanDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Theoretical Neuroscience and Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Matthew PanichelloDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Timothy J BuschmanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-2761
W Jeffrey JohnstonDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Theoretical Neuroscience and Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.ORCID 0000-0002-4725-8602

Funding

Core Research Computing FacilityG20RR030893 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PURDY, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2010
$10.0M
ADVANCED GRADUATE TRAINING PROGRAM IN THEORETICAL NEUROSCIENCET32NS064929 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Laurence F. Abbott, Roudabeh Behnia · 2009 to 2026
$2.9M
Understanding the Network Mechanisms that Control Working MemoryR01MH115042 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BUSCHMAN, TIMOTHY J. · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
CRCNS: Multiple Time Scale Memory Consolidation in Neural NetworksR01MH129031 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI FUSI, STEFANO, REYES, ALEX D · 2021 to 2023
$1.2M
DOD | National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) N/AGatsby Charitable Foundation (GATSBY) GAT3708HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01MH115042National Science Foundation (NSF) Neuronex 1707398NCRR NIH HHS G20 RR030893NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115042NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129031NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS064929Simons Foundation (SF) 542983SPI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When making decisions in a cluttered world, humans and other animals often have to hold multiple items in memory at once-such as the different items on a shopping list. Psychophysical experiments in humans and other animals have shown remembered stimuli can sometimes become confused, with participants reporting chimeric stimuli composed of features from different stimuli. In particular, subjects will often make "swap errors" where they misattribute a feature from one object as belonging to another object. While swap errors have been described behaviorally and theoretical explanations have been proposed, their neural mechanisms are unknown. Here, we elucidate these neural mechanisms by analyzing neural population recordings from monkeys performing two multistimulus working memory tasks. In these tasks, monkeys were cued to report the color of an item that either was previously shown at a corresponding location or will be shown at the corresponding location. Animals made swap errors in both tasks. In the neural data, we find evidence that the neural correlates of swap errors emerged when correctly remembered information is selected from working memory. This led to a representation of the distractor color as if it were the target color, underlying the eventual swap error. We did not find consistent evidence that swap errors arose from misinterpretation of the cue or errors during encoding or storage in working memory. These results provide evidence that swap errors emerge during selection of correctly remembered information from working memory, and highlight this selection as a crucial-yet surprisingly brittle-neural process.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermAnimalsCuesMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsneural populationswap errorsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID39102534
PMCPMC11331092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.