ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
The neural basis of swap errors in working memory.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracking the Fidelity of Internal Neural Representations with Error-In-Variables Regression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Expectation Exerts Flexible and Context-dependent Influence on Conscious Object Recognition.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Alpha phase coding supports feature binding during working memory maintenance.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Human Beta Oscillations Reflect Magnitude and Fidelity of Priority Shifts in Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Item-based Parsing of Dynamic Scenes in a Combined Attentional Tracking and Working Memory Task.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Semi-orthogonal subspaces for value mediate a binding and generalization trade-off.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- The neural basis of swap errors in working memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When making decisions in a cluttered world, humans and other animals often have to hold multiple items in memory at once-such as the different items on a shopping list. Psychophysical experiments in humans and other animals have shown remembered stimuli can sometimes become confused, with participants reporting chimeric stimuli composed of features from different stimuli. In particular, subjects will often make "swap errors" where they misattribute a feature from one object as belonging to another object. While swap errors have been described behaviorally and theoretical explanations have been proposed, their neural mechanisms are unknown. Here, we elucidate these neural mechanisms by analyzing neural population recordings from monkeys performing two multistimulus working memory tasks. In these tasks, monkeys were cued to report the color of an item that either was previously shown at a corresponding location or will be shown at the corresponding location. Animals made swap errors in both tasks. In the neural data, we find evidence that the neural correlates of swap errors emerged when correctly remembered information is selected from working memory. This led to a representation of the distractor color as if it were the target color, underlying the eventual swap error. We did not find consistent evidence that swap errors arose from misinterpretation of the cue or errors during encoding or storage in working memory. These results provide evidence that swap errors emerge during selection of correctly remembered information from working memory, and highlight this selection as a crucial-yet surprisingly brittle-neural process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.