ArticlePloS one2024
Biofilm formation, agr typing and antibiotic resistance pattern in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospital environments.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiofilm activity of Limosilactobacillus fermentum SH2 and Lactococcus lactis extracts against strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus hominis SH7, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Interplay between enterotoxigenicity, antimicrobial resistance, and persistence mechanisms in Staphylococcus spp. across different origins.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Biofilm-Forming Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Comprehensive Phenotypic and Genotypic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Relationship between agr types, toxin genes, and antibiotic resistance in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Anti-Biofilm Activity of Combinations of Cinnamic Acid and Its Derivatives with Cloxacillin Against Methicillin-ResistantCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Tetrahedral framework nucleic acid delivery of emodin enables precision antibacterial and anti-inflammatory therapy for drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Epidemiological analysis of biofilm-forming methicillin-resistantFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Emergence of ST8-USA300 and ST8-USA300-Latin American variant: a changing landscape of community-associated methicillin-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Smart hybrid nanomaterials for chronic infections: microbiome-responsive and sustainable therapeutic platforms.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Characterization and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Biofilm Forming Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Antimicrobials Resistance Profiling and Clonal Lineages ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2025Article
- Structural characteristics, functions, and counteracting strategies of biofilms inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofilm development significantly enhances the virulence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), leading to severe infections and decreased susceptibility to antibiotics, especially in strains associated with hospital environments. This study examined the occurrence of MRSA, their ability to form biofilms, agr typing, and the antibiotic resistance profiles of biofilm-forming MRSA strains isolated from environmental surfaces at Mymensingh Medical College Hospital (MMCH). From 120 swab samples, 86 (71.67%) tested positive for S. aureus. MRSA was identified in 86 isolates using the disk diffusion technique, and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), 56 (65.1%) isolates were confirmed to carry the mecA gene. The Crystal Violet Microtiter Plate (CVMP) test revealed that 80.35% (45 isolates) were biofilm-forming and 19.6% (11 isolates) were non-biofilm-forming. Out of 45 biofilm producer isolates 37.5% and 42.9% isolates exhibited strong and intermediate biofilm-forming characteristics, respectively. Molecular analysis revealed that 17.78% of MRSA isolates carried at least one gene related to biofilm formation, specifically icaA, icaB, and icaD genes were discovered in 13.33%, 8.89%, 6.67% of the MRSA isolates, respectively. In agr typing, the most prevalent group was agr I (71.11%), followed by group III (17.78%) and group II (11.11%). Group IV was not detected. The distribution of agr gene groups showed a significant difference among biofilm-forming isolates (p < 0.05). In agr group I, 18.75% of isolates carried the icaA gene, 12.5% carried the icaB gene, and 9.37% carried the icaD gene. Biofilm-forming genes were not detected in any of the isolates from agr groups II or III. There are no statistically significant differences between agr groups and the presence of these genes (p > 0.05). Antibiotic resistance varied significantly among agr groups, with agr group I displaying the highest resistance, agr group II, and agr group III exhibiting the least resistance (p < 0.05). Seventy-three (73.3%) of the isolates were multi-drug resistant, with agr group I displaying nineteen MDR patterns. The occurrence of MRSA in hospital environments and their capacity to form biofilm raises concerns for public health. These findings support the importance of further research focused on agr quorum sensing systems as a basis for developing novel antibacterial agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.