ArticleJAMA2024
Modernizing the Data Infrastructure for Clinical Research to Meet Evolving Demands for Evidence.
Article in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Near-Real-Time Clinical Trial Accrual Dashboard in a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center: Mixed Methods Implementation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- The Case for the Pediatric Cardiologist-Informaticist.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Follow the data: tracking data quality and completeness in oncology real-world data.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- The potential of artificial intelligence in clinical trials.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- COVID-19 vaccination carries no association with childbirth rates in Sweden.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- How would Marie Kondo design a protocol? In favor of subtractive change in clinical trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prototype master protocol for benchmarking of real-world follow-up data in glaucoma.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
- Improved Survival and Prognostication in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases: An Update of the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- From precision interventions to precision health.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Early Blood Pressures Warrant Attention in Modern Clinical Data Infrastructure.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Article
- Collaborator Corrected.JAMA · 2025Article
- Advances, Overuse, and Shared Decision-Making in Abdominal Wall Surgery.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Article
- Paradoxes in pediatric rehabilitation: building an interdisciplinary, total-child framework to promote effective interventions and life course well-being.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The ways in which we access, acquire, and use data in clinical trials have evolved very little over time, resulting in a fragmented and inefficient system that limits the amount and quality of evidence that can be generated. Observations: Clinical trial design has advanced steadily over several decades. Yet the infrastructure for clinical trial data collection remains expensive and labor intensive and limits the amount of evidence that can be collected to inform whether and how interventions work for different patient populations. Meanwhile, there is increasing demand for evidence from randomized clinical trials to inform regulatory decisions, payment decisions, and clinical care. Although substantial public and industry investment in advancing electronic health record interoperability, data standardization, and the technology systems used for data capture have resulted in significant progress on various aspects of data generation, there is now a need to combine the results of these efforts and apply them more directly to the clinical trial data infrastructure. Conclusions and Relevance: We describe a vision for a modernized infrastructure that is centered around 2 related concepts. First, allowing the collection and rigorous evaluation of multiple data sources and types and, second, enabling the possibility to reuse health data for multiple purposes. We address the need for multidisciplinary collaboration and suggest ways to measure progress toward this goal.
Identifiers
39102333What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.