Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102299›Full record

ReviewThe FEBS journal2025

The role of the gut microbiota in regulating responses to vaccination: current knowledge and future directions.

Charné Rossouw, Feargal J Ryan, David J Lynn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charné RossouwPrecision Medicine, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.
Feargal J RyanPrecision Medicine, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1565-4598
David J LynnPrecision Medicine, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4664-1404

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1098429National Health and Medical Research Council APP1156415National Health and Medical Research Council APP2017404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigen-specific B and T cell responses play a critical role in vaccine-mediated protection against infectious diseases, but these responses are highly variable between individuals and vaccine immunogenicity is frequently sub-optimal in infants, the elderly and in people living in low- and middle-income countries. Although many factors such as nutrition, age, sex, genetics, environmental exposures, and infections may all contribute to variable vaccine immunogenicity, mounting evidence indicates that the gut microbiota is an important and targetable factor shaping optimal immune responses to vaccination. In this review, we discuss evidence from human, preclinical and experimental studies supporting a role for a healthy gut microbiota in mediating optimal vaccine immunogenicity, including the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the potential mechanisms through which this could occur and discuss strategies that could be used to target the microbiota to boost vaccine immunogenicity where it is currently sub-optimal.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunogenicity, VaccineVaccinationAnimalsB-LymphocytesHumansSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesCOVID-19 Vaccinesantibody responsesCOVID‐19microbiomemicrobiotavaccination

Identifiers

PMID39102299
PMCPMC11927049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.