Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102268›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Ferritin Cutoffs and Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency in Primary Care.

Levy Jäger, Yael Rachamin, Oliver Senn, Jakob M Burgstaller, Thomas Rosemann, Stefan Markun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hook effect for ferritin immunoassays: implications for clinical practice.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Practice-oriented rational assessment of anemia].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Iron Deficiency-More Than Just Anemia: A Literature Review.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2025
    Review
  15. Diagnostics: Markers of Body Iron Status.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Levy JägerInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yael RachaminInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oliver SennInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jakob M BurgstallerInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas RosemannInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefan MarkunInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Ferritin is often measured by general practitioners, but the association of different cutoffs with the rates of iron deficiency diagnoses, particularly nonanemic iron deficiency, is unknown. Objective: To investigate the association of the ferritin cutoff choice with the incidence of nonanemic and anemic iron deficiency diagnoses in primary care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, patients 18 years or older with at least 1 consultation with a general practitioner participating in the Family Medicine Research Using Electronic Medical Records (FIRE) project, an electronic medical records database of Swiss primary care, from January 1, 2021, to November 30, 2023, were evaluated. Exposures: Sex, age, clinical patient characteristics, and professional general practitioner characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of iron deficiency diagnoses (nonanemic and anemic) at ferritin cutoffs of 15, 30, and 45 ng/mL and ferritin testing itself. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine associations of patient and general practitioner characteristics with ferritin testing as adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs). Results: The study included 255 351 patients (median [IQR] age, 52 [36-66] years; 52.1% female). Per 1000 patient-years and at ferritin cutoffs of 15, 30, and 45 ng/mL, iron deficiency diagnoses had incidences of 10.9 (95% CI, 10.6-11.2), 29.9 (95% CI, 29.4-30.4), and 48.3 (95% CI, 47.7-48.9) cases, respectively; nonanemic iron deficiency diagnoses had incidences of 4.1 (95% CI, 3.9-4.2), 14.6 (95% CI, 14.3-15.0), and 25.8 (95% CI, 25.3-26.2) cases, respectively; and anemic iron deficiency diagnoses had incidences of 3.5 (95% CI, 3.3-3.7), 6.0 (95% CI, 5.8-6.2), and 7.5 (95% CI, 7.3-7.7) cases, respectively. Ferritin testing showed notable associations with fatigue (AHR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.95-2.12), anemia (AHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.70-1.79), and iron therapy (AHR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.46-1.54). Ferritin testing was associated with female sex in all age groups, including postmenopausal. Of the patients who received ferritin testing, 72.1% received concomitant hemoglobin testing, and 49.6% received concomitant C-reactive protein testing. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of primary care patients, ferritin cutoffs of 30 and 45 ng/mL were associated with a substantially higher incidence of iron deficiency compared with 15 ng/mL. These results provide a basis for health system-level evaluation and benchmarking of ferritin testing in high-resource settings and call for a harmonization of diagnostic criteria for iron deficiency in primary care.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyFerritinsPrimary Health CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceIron DeficienciesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSwitzerlandFerritins

Identifiers

PMID39102268
PMCPMC11301556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.