ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Topographic Clinical Insights From Deep Learning-Based Geographic Atrophy Progression Prediction.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lampalizumab Administered Intravitreally to Patients With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lampalizumab Administered Intravitreally to Patients With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
A Multicenter, Prospective Epidemiologic Study of The Progression of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Detection and Management of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Noninvasive Retinal Images and Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the contributions of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) topographic imaging features to the performance of convolutional neural network-based deep learning (DL) algorithms in predicting geographic atrophy (GA) growth rate. Methods: Retrospective study with data from study eyes from three clinical trials (NCT02247479, NCT02247531, NCT02479386) in GA. The algorithm was initially trained with full FAF images, and its performance was considered benchmark. Ablation experiments investigated the contribution of imaging features to the performance of the algorithms. Three FAF image regions were defined relative to GA: Lesion, Rim, and Background. For No Lesion, No Rim, and No Background datasets, a single region of interest was removed at a time. For Lesion, Rim, and Background Shuffled datasets, individual region pixels were randomly shuffled. For Lesion, Rim, and Background Mask datasets, masks of the regions were used. A Convex Hull dataset was generated to evaluate the importance of lesion size. Squared Pearson correlation (r2) was used to compare the predictive performance of ablated datasets relative to the benchmark. Results: The Rim region influenced r2 more than the other two regions in all experiments, indicating the most relevant contribution of this region to the performance of the algorithms. In addition, similar performance was observed for all regions when pixels were shuffled or only a mask was used, indicating intensity information was not independently informative without textural context. Conclusions: These ablation experiments enabled topographic clinical insights on FAF images from a DL-based GA progression prediction algorithm. Translational Relevance: Results from this study may lead to new insights on GA progression prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.