Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102225›Full record

Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2024

Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus Probiotics and Gut Dysbiosis in Preterm Infants: The PRIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Thea Van Rossum, Annette Haiß, Rebecca L Knoll, Janina Marißen, Daniel Podlesny, Julia Pagel, Marina Bleskina, Maren Vens, Ingmar Fortmann, Bastian Siller and 35 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Efficacy ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The gut-lung axis in early life: microbiome-associated mechanisms and clinical relevance.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Priming innate immunity and long-term outcome.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

45 authors.

Thea Van RossumEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Annette HaißDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Rebecca L KnollDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Janina MarißenDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Daniel PodlesnyEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julia PagelDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Marina BleskinaInstitute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Maren VensInstitute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Ingmar FortmannDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Bastian SillerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Isabell RicklefsDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Jonas KloppDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Katja HilbertDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Claudius MeyerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Roman ThielemannEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sybelle Goedicke-FritzDepartment of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Homburg, Germany.
Martin KuntzDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christian WiegChildren's Hospital Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany.
Norbert TeigDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Thorsten KörnerChildren's Hospital Mitte Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Angela KribsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Hannes HudallaDepartment of Neonatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus KnufChildren's Hospital Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Anja SteinDepartment of Pediatrics I, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
Christian GilleDepartment of Neonatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Soyhan BagciDepartment of Neonatology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Frank DohleChildren's Hospital Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany.
Hans ProquittéDepartment of Neonatology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Dirk M OlbertzDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Rostock Südstadt, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Esther SchmidtHelios Children's Hospital Schwerin, Schwerin, Germany.
Lutz KochChildren's Hospital Hamburg Wilhelmstift and Marien-Hospital Hamburg, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Sabine PirrDepartment of Neonatology, Allergology and Pediatric Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jan RuppDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Juliane SpieglerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Matthias V KoppDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Wolfgang GöpelDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Egbert HertingDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Sofia K ForslundEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dorothee ViemannDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Michael ZemlinDepartment of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Homburg, Germany.
Peer BorkEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stephan GehringDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Inke R KönigInstitute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Philipp HennekeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph HärtelDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The effects of probiotic interventions on colonization with resistant bacteria and early microbiome development in preterm infants remain to be clarified. Objective: To examine the efficacy of Bifidobacterium longum subsp infantis, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis (BB-12), and Lactobacillus acidophilus (La-5) probiotics to prevent colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms or highly epidemic bacteria (MDRO+) and to shape the microbiome of preterm infants toward the eubiotic state of healthy full-term infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: The multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, group sequential, phase 3 Priming Immunity at the Beginning of Life (PRIMAL) randomized clinical trial, conducted from April 2018 to June 2020, included infants with gestational age of 28 to 32 weeks at 18 German neonatal units. Data analyses were conducted from March 2020 to August 2023. Intervention: A total of 28 days of multistrain probiotics diluted in human milk/formula starting within the first 72 hours of life. Main Outcomes and Measures: Colonization with MDRO+ at day 30 of life (primary end point), late-onset sepsis and severe gastrointestinal complication (safety end points), and gut dysbiosis, ie, deviations from the microbiome of healthy, term infants (eubiosis score) based on 16-subunit ribosomal RNA and metagenomic sequencing. Results: Among the 643 infants randomized until the stop of recruitment based on interim results, 618 (median [IQR] gestational age, 31.0 [29.7-32.1] weeks; 333 male [53.9%]; mean [SD] birth weight, 1502 [369] g) had follow-up at day 30. The interim analysis with all available data from 219 infants revealed MDRO+ colonization in 43 of 115 infants (37.4%) in the probiotics group and in 39 of 104 infants (37.5%) in the control group (adjusted risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.54-1.81; P = .97). Safety outcomes were similar in both groups, ie, late-onset sepsis (probiotics group: 8 of 316 infants [2.5%]; control group: 12 of 322 infants [3.7%]) and severe gastrointestinal complications (probiotics group: 6 of 316 infants [1.9%]; control group: 7 of 322 infants [2.2%]). The probiotics group had higher eubiosis scores than the control group at the genus level (254 vs 258 infants; median scores, 0.47 vs 0.41; odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13) and species level (96 vs 83 infants; median scores, 0.87 vs 0.59; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19-1.38). Environmental uptake of the B infantis probiotic strain in the control group was common (41 of 84 [49%]), which was highly variable across sites and particularly occurred in infants with a sibling who was treated with probiotics. Conclusions and Relevance: Multistrain probiotics did not reduce the incidence of MDRO+ colonization at day 30 of life in preterm infants but modulated their microbiome toward eubiosis. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00013197.

Indexed as

DysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeInfant, PrematureProbioticsBifidobacteriumDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesLactobacillusMale

Identifiers

PMID39102225
PMCPMC12549143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.