Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102205›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024

Biosocial Technical Systems: An Emerging Approach to Analyse Responses to Novel Diseases.

André Sica de Campos, Rebeca Buzzo Feltrin, Janaina Oliveira Pamplona da Costa, Paula Xavier Dos Santos, Gustavo Carvalho, Mariana Borges de Medeiros, Pierre Chagnon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

André Sica de CamposSchool of Applied Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Pedro Zaccaria, 1300, Limeira, SP, CEP 13484-350, Brazil. andre.campos@fca.unicamp.br.
Rebeca Buzzo FeltrinFundação Oswaldo Cruz and Department of Science and Technology Policy, Institute of Geosciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Carlos Gomes, 250, Campinas, SP, CEP 13083-855, Brazil.
Janaina Oliveira Pamplona da CostaDepartment of Science and Technology Policy, Institute of Geosciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Carlos Gomes, 250, Campinas, SP, CEP 13083-855, Brazil.
Paula Xavier Dos SantosFundação Oswaldo Cruz Av. Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ CEP 21040-900, Brazil.
Gustavo CarvalhoFundação Oswaldo Cruz Av. Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ CEP 21040-900, Brazil.
Mariana Borges de MedeirosFundação Oswaldo Cruz Av. Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ CEP 21040-900, Brazil.
Pierre ChagnonFundação Oswaldo Cruz Av. Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ CEP 21040-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic emerged in the context of a parallel epidemic of information, namely an infodemic. With the development of vaccines occurring in record time, a disinformation campaign ensued rendering the infodemic ever more troubling. As COVID-19 had to be curbed with vaccines opinion pools and surveys indicated that a minority, but relevant, part of the general public had weakened trust in public health policies and also on governmental responses to the pandemic in general. This dissent in public opinion on pandemic response is interpreted in this chapter as a controversy related to the efficacy and risks associated to vaccines. Such controversy gained momentum partly because traditional scientific communication has been largely unidirectional rather than bi-directional. We propose to apply a novel biosocial technical perspective to examine the COVID-19 pandemic controversy and communication, articulating social, biological and technical issues. The interaction between COVID-19 and vaccines, i.e. artefact-biological interactions, resulted in vaccine development in record time. However, the interaction between social systems and vaccine as artefacts was plagued by partial public reluctance in their acceptance. This rendered communication efforts ever more relevant, bringing lessons related to the importance of a more fluid bi-directional communication in future disease epidemics.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPublic OpinionHumansPandemicsPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesCommunicationControversiesCOVID-19

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.