SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2024
A meta-analysis examining the impact of obesity on surgical site wound complications in patients undergoing primary ovarian cancer surgery.
Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The meta-analysis sought to evaluate and compare the effect of obesity on surgical site wound problems in subjects after primary ovarian cancer surgery. The results found by this meta-analysis were analyzed, and then odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD), at 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. These models might be dichotomous or contentious, random, or fixed effect models. The current meta-analysis included nine exams from 2009 to 2023, including 4362 females with primary ovarian cancer surgeries. Obesity had a significantly higher risk of surgical site wound infections (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 2.27-3.69, p < 0.001), and wound problems (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.83-9.34, p < 0.001) compared to non-obesity in females with primary ovarian cancer surgeries. It was revealed, by examining the data, that obesity was associated with significantly higher incidence of surgical site wound infections, and wound problems compared to non-obesity in females with primary ovarian cancer surgeries. However, attention should be given to the values because some of the comparisons included a small number of chosen studies,.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39102155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.