Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102126›Full record

ReviewPituitary2024

Pituitary Apoplexy: a re-appraisal of risk factors and best management strategies in the COVID-19 era.

Andre E Boyke, Michelot Michel, Adam N Mamelak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andre E BoykeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, A6600, USA.
Michelot MichelUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Adam N MamelakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, A6600, USA. mamelaka@cshs.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary apoplexy (PA) is a clinical syndrome caused by acute hemorrhage and/or infarction of the pituitary gland, most commonly in the setting of a pituitary macroadenoma. PA generally presents with severe headache, nausea, vomiting, visual disturbance, and, in more severe cases, altered mental status. Many factors have been attributed to the risk of developing PA, including most recently, numerous reports showcasing an association with COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Initial management of PA includes evaluation and correction of deficient hormones and electrolytes and an assessment if surgical decompression to relieve pressure on optic nerves and other brain structures is needed. While prompt recognition and treatment are crucial to avoid morbidity and mortality, in the modern era, PA is less commonly considered a true neurosurgical emergency requiring immediate (< 24 h) surgical decompression. Traditionally, surgical decompression has been the standard of care for significant mass effects. However, several studies have shown similar outcomes in visual and hormonal recovery with either surgical decompression or conservative medical management. Unfortunately, most evidence on optimal management strategies is limited to retrospective case series, small prospective studies, and one multi-center observational study. This review aims to provide the most up-to-date evidence on the role of COVID-19 in PA and best management strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pituitary ApoplexyDecompression, SurgicalHumansRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Medical managementOutcomesPituitary apoplexyReviewTranssphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

PMID39102126
PMCPMC11632005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.