Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102116›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2024

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of ticks and tick-borne pathogens from cattle in selected villages of Greater Letaba Municipality in Limpopo Province, South Africa.

Katleho Sechaba Monakale, Rae Marvin Smith, Realeboga Masego Gaorekwe, Maphuti Betty Ledwaba, Dikeledi Petunia Malatji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Under the scales: Identification of ticks in rehabilitated African pangolins and confiscated scales.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katleho Sechaba MonakaleDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of South Africa, 28 Pioneer Avenue, Roodepoort, 1709, South Africa.
Rae Marvin SmithDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of South Africa, 28 Pioneer Avenue, Roodepoort, 1709, South Africa.
Realeboga Masego GaorekweDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of South Africa, 28 Pioneer Avenue, Roodepoort, 1709, South Africa.
Maphuti Betty LedwabaDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of South Africa, 28 Pioneer Avenue, Roodepoort, 1709, South Africa.
Dikeledi Petunia MalatjiDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of South Africa, 28 Pioneer Avenue, Roodepoort, 1709, South Africa. malatdp@unisa.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks are blood ectoparasites that feed on domestic, wild animals and humans. They spread a variety of infections such as protozoa, viruses, and bacteria. Moreover, cattle reared by smallholder farmers are susceptible to ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Therefore, accurate identification of ticks and detection of tick-borne pathogens is crucial. The main aim of this study was to identify and characterize ticks and tick-borne pathogens from selected villages in Greater Letaba Municipality, Limpopo Province, using morphological and molecular techniques. A total of 233 ticks were collected from cattle and identified morphologically using appropriate morphological keys. The following tick species were identified: Amblyomma hebraeum, Hyalomma rufipes, Hyalomma truncatum, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Rhipicephalus spp. was the most common species accounting to 73.8% of the identified ticks. The genomic DNA was extracted from the whole tick for tick identification and from midguts of the ticks for the detection of tick-borne pathogens, followed by amplification and sequencing. A total of 27 samples were positive for tick-borne pathogens: 23 samples tested positive for Theileria and four samples tested positive for Ehrlichia. Anaplasma and Rickettsial OmpB could not be detected from any of the samples. There was no obvious grouping of ticks and tick-borne pathogens on the bases of their locality. The findings of this study confirm previous reports that indicated that cattle reared by smallholder farmers harbor various ticks and tick-borne pathogens of veterinary, public health, and economic importance. Regular monitoring of tick infestations in villages around the study areas is recommended to avoid disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesTick-Borne DiseasesTick InfestationsAnaplasmaAnimalsCattleEhrlichiaFemaleGenotypeIxodidaeMaleSouth AfricaTheileriaTicks16S rRNACattleDNATick-borne pathogensTicks

Identifiers

PMID39102116
PMCPMC11300509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.