ArticleLa Radiologia medica2024
Role of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the management of radiologic-pathologic discordance: a retrospective single-centre study.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiologic-Pathologic Discordance After Image-Guided Breast Biopsy: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting postoperative malignancy upgrading in B1-B3 breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound features.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Intraductal papilloma of the breast: low risk, but handle with care.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Real-time deep learning for tumor segmentation and tool tracking: development and validation of an AI navigation system in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by US-guided core needle biopsy: clinical, pathological and US features associated with upgrading to malignancy.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (US-VAB) in radiologic-pathologic (rad-path) discordance in women with suspicious breast lesions.
methodsTwo thousand three hundred and sixty patients with 2385 BI-RADS category 4 and 5 lesions underwent percutaneous US-guided CNB. Thirty-six lesions were classified as discordant benign and underwent second-line US-VAB. A 14-gauge needle was utilized for CNB and 10-gauge for US-VAB. Final pathology was the reference standard for women who underwent surgery, imaging follow-up in other cases. Rates of malignancy for US-VAB and subsequent surgery were evaluated. Lesions with upgrade and no upgrade to second-line VAB were compared in terms of patient's age, lesion type and characteristics, size and BI-RADS category. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) for BI-RADS categories and diagnostic performance for second-line US-VAB were calculated. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (t-test, Mann-Whitney, χ
resultsUS-VAB identified 10 B2, 9 B3 and 17 B5 lesions with upgrade to malignancy of 47.2% (17/36). There were 8 invasive no special type, 7 ductal in situ, 1 invasive lobular carcinoma and 1 angiosarcoma, and their distribution among BI-RADS categories was: 2/2 in BI-RADS 5 (100%), 12/18 in BI-RADS 4C (67%) and 3/16 in BI-RADS 4B lesions (19%) (p = 0.006). Of the remaining 19 lesions, 6 underwent surgery and 2 were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ; 13 underwent radiological follow-up and one resulted malignant. False-negative rate for US-VAB was 15.8% (3/19) with final upgrade to malignancy of 55% (20/36). The univariate analysis revealed mass shape (p = 0.008) and BI-RADS categories (p = 0.006) to be associated with upgrade to malignancy. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy for US-VAB were 85, 100, 100, 84 and 92%, respectively.
conclusionsUS-VAB identified almost 50% of cancers missed by CNB, avoiding surgical biopsies and validating as an effective mini-invasive approach in rad-path discordance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39102107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.