Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102072›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2026

Periodontal evaluation after maxillary expansion with a tooth-bone-borne expander in growing patients : A randomized clinical trial.

Bruno de Paula Machado Pasqua, Michelle Sendyk, Cristiane Barros André, João Batista de Paiva, Benedict Wilmes, José Rino Neto

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bruno de Paula Machado PasquaSchool of Orthodontics, University of São Paulo, Professor Lineu Prestes Avenue 2227, 05508-000, São Paulo, Brazil. brunompasqua@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0890-6179
Michelle SendykSchool of Orthodontics, University of São Paulo, Professor Lineu Prestes Avenue 2227, 05508-000, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4458-8064
Cristiane Barros AndréTechnology Research Center, University of Mogi das Cruzes, Reverendo Henrique de Oliveira Camargo Street 374, 18090-170, Mogi das Cruzes, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-7986
João Batista de PaivaSchool of Orthodontics, University of São Paulo, Professor Lineu Prestes Avenue 2227, 05508-000, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3178-4843
Benedict WilmesDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1870-1203
José Rino NetoSchool of Orthodontics, University of São Paulo, Professor Lineu Prestes Avenue 2227, 05508-000, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-8698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate and compare periodontal changes due to rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne devices in growing patients via clinical examinations and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-two eligible patients (aged 11-14 years; transverse maxillary deficiency, posterior crossbite) were screened and divided into two groups based on the treatment received (randomization was performed using computer-generated numeric sequences): hybrid hyrax tooth-bone-borne group (TBB) and hyrax tooth-borne group (TB). The primary outcome was the change in cortical bone thickness (by CBCT). In addition, the clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession, and bleeding were assessed. Both examinations were performed before and 3 months after the activation phase. Intergroup comparisons were performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA; P < 0.05).

resultsTwenty-one patients (12 girls and 9 boys; mean initial age, 13.3 years) were included in the TBB group and 21 (5 girls and 16 boys; mean initial age, 13.2 years) were included in the TB group. The TB group exhibited a decrease in buccal bone thickness in the first premolars and first molars at all three evaluated levels. Specifically, tooth 14 at 3 mm from the enamel-cement junction showed a significant width reduction (0.7 mm; p < 0.001), accompanied by a notable increase in palatal cortical thickness at 6 mm of enamel-cement junction (1.13 mm; p < 0.001).

conclusionsRME resulted in buccal bone thickness reduction at the first premolar with hyrax treatment. In the molar region, both devices resulted in cortical bone alterations that were less pronounced in the TBB group.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Anchorage ProceduresPalatal Expansion TechniqueAdolescentChildCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleOrthodontic Appliance DesignTreatment OutcomeAlveolar bone lossCone-beam computed tomographyFixed orthodontic appliancesOrthodontic anchorage techniqueRandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.