ArticleArchives of dermatological research2024
Adjunctive treatment of atopic dermatitis with novel at-home handheld narrow-band UVB phototherapy.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While conventional in-office phototherapy has long been utilized as a successful treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD), it is associated with potential barriers including inconvenience, poor adherence, time and financial expense. In this retrospective study, we examine the efficacy, adherence, and patient-satisfaction of using adjunctive at-home, self-administered phototherapy utilizing a novel handheld narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) device for the treatment of refractory mild to severe AD. Included AD patients were initially trained on proper use of the device. These patients treated involved areas three times per week for a period of 12 weeks. Phototherapy dosing protocol was based on skin type. The cohort included 52 patients, who were aged 20-69 and represented all skin types. They were initially categorized by disease involvement as mild, moderate, and severe. Patients were also queried to self-score their disease severity and level of satisfaction. Compared to baseline, at 12 weeks, 48% percent of patients indicated that at least one site was Clear/Almost Clear, 38% stated that more than 50% of body locations were Clear/Almost Clear, and 28% reported that 100% (all) treated sites were Clear/Almost Clear. After using at-home hand-held NB-UVB for the study duration, 67% (35/52) of patients experienced disease improvement. Mean overall satisfaction was extremely high at 4.43 on a 5-point scale. Skin type, age, gender, and disease severity at inception did not significantly affect patient satisfaction scores. Overall adherence rate among participants across all groups was 73%. In this small retrospective study, at-home handheld NB-UVB phototherapy was found to be an effective, well-tolerated, adjunctive treatment method for patients with refractory AD, which was associated with a high level of patient satisfaction and adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39102061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.