ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024
Topographic anatomy of the endolymphatic sac: a pilot cadaveric dissection study.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe precise location of the endolymphatic sac (ES) may be difficult during surgical approaches. This morphometric study aimed to determine the exact location of ES in adult human cadavers for the management of pathologies such as Meniere's disease.
methodsTwenty temporal bones of 10 adult cadavers (mean age: 70 ± 13.40 years, range: 45-92 years; sex: 4 males and 6 females) fixed with 10% formalin were bilaterally dissected to obtain numeric data about the location of ES.
resultsDistances of ES to the posterior semicircular canal (PSC), Donaldson line (DL), sigmoid sinus (SS) and sinodural angle (SA) were found as 2.76 ± 1.18 (0.96-5.58) mm, 1.74 ± 1.13 (0.58-5.07) mm, 2.30 ± 1.09 (0.54-4.91) mm and 16.04 ± 3.15 (9.82-22.18) mm, respectively. In addition, the angle between the tangents passing through the cortical bone (CB) and SS was determined as 35.37°±11.32° (21.30°-60.58°). No statistical difference was found between right-left or male-female measurements (p > 0.05).
conclusionDL, SS, and PSC are essential anatomical landmarks for determining the location of ES. The spatial location of SS, including its depth to the cortical bone and the distance to anteriorly located anatomical structures of the mastoid cavity consisting of the facial nerve and PSC, is believed to be underlined for ES surgery. Our data may be used as a database to further define the relationship between ES and adjacent anatomical structures (SS, PSC, etc.) during the application of surgical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39102044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.