Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39101636›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2024

Effect of nature on the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents: meta-review.

Tessa Lomax, Joseph Butler, Andrea Cipriani, Ilina Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tessa LomaxDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4169-0971
Joseph ButlerOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK; and Oxford Precision Psychiatry Lab, NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5179-8321
Ilina SinghDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4497-3587

Funding

Department of Health NIHR203316Department of Health RP-2017-08-ST2-006National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames ValleyNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre ACF-2021-13-010NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203316NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre RP-2017-08-ST2-006Wellcome Trust 203132Wellcome Trust 203132/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust GALENOS Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrbanisation is taking place worldwide and rates of mental illness are rising. There has been increasing interest in 'nature' and how it may benefit mental health and well-being.

aimsTo understand how the literature defines nature; what the characteristics of the nature intervention are; what mental health and well-being outcomes are being measured; and what the evidence shows, in regard to how nature affects the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents.

methodA meta-review was conducted, searching three databases for relevant primary and secondary studies, using key search terms including 'nature' and 'mental health' and 'mental well-being'. Inclusion criteria included published English-language studies on the child and adolescent population. Authors identified the highest quality evidence from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and analysed using descriptive content analysis.

resultsSixteen systematic reviews, two scoping reviews and five good quality cohort studies were included. 'Nature' was conceptualised along a continuum (the 'nature research framework') into three categories: a human-designed environment with natural elements; a human-designed natural environment; and a natural environment. The nature 'intervention' falls into three areas (the 'nature intervention framework'): access, exposure and engagement with nature, with quantity and quality of nature relevant to all areas. Mental health and well-being outcomes fit along a continuum, with 'disorder' at one end and 'well-being' at the other. Nature appears to have a beneficial effect, but we cannot be certain of this.

conclusionsNature appears to have a beneficial effect on mental health and well-being of children and adolescents. Evidence is lacking on clinical populations, ethnically diverse populations and populations in low- and middle-income countries. Our results should be interpreted considering the limitations of the included studies and confidence in findings.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdolescentChildHumansMental DisordersNatureChildhood experiencedepressive disorderslow- and middle-income countriesneurodevelopmental disorderspsychosocial interventions

Identifiers

PMID39101636
PMCPMC11536187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.