ArticleJournal of neuropathology and experimental neurology2024
Deep learning assisted quantitative analysis of Aβ and microglia in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in relation to cognitive outcome.
Article in Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuropathologic changes of Alzheimer disease (AD) including Aβ accumulation and neuroinflammation are frequently observed in the cerebral cortex of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). We created an automated analysis platform to quantify Aβ load and reactive microglia in the vicinity of Aβ plaques and to evaluate their association with cognitive outcome in cortical biopsies of patients with iNPH obtained at the time of shunting. Aiforia Create deep learning software was used on whole slide images of Iba1/4G8 double immunostained frontal cortical biopsies of 120 shunted iNPH patients to identify Iba1-positive microglia somas and Aβ areas, respectively. Dementia, AD clinical syndrome (ACS), and Clinical Dementia Rating Global score (CDR-GS) were evaluated retrospectively after a median follow-up of 4.4 years. Deep learning artificial intelligence yielded excellent (>95%) precision for tissue, Aβ, and microglia somas. Using an age-adjusted model, higher Aβ coverage predicted the development of dementia, the diagnosis of ACS, and more severe memory impairment by CDR-GS whereas measured microglial densities and Aβ-related microglia did not correlate with cognitive outcome in these patients. Therefore, cognitive outcome seems to be hampered by higher Aβ coverage in cortical biopsies in shunted iNPH patients but is not correlated with densities of surrounding microglia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.