Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39101508›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2025

Making the most of canopy light: shade avoidance under a fluctuating spectrum and irradiance.

Romina Sellaro, Maxime Durand, Pedro J Aphalo, Jorge J Casal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Leaf Traits, Yield Components, and Seed Quality ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Growth, phytohormone and transcriptome responses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Shining light on photosynthesis.Journal of experimental botany · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Romina SellaroUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), Facultad de Agronomía, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-4412-1352
Maxime DurandOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Viikki Plant Science Centre, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8991-3601
Pedro J AphaloOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Viikki Plant Science Centre, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3385-972X
Jorge J CasalUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), Facultad de Agronomía, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-6525-8414

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Cientıfica y Tecnologica PICT-2021-I-A-01070Research Council of Finland 351008University of Buenos Aires 20020220200108BA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field, plants face constantly changing light conditions caused by both atmospheric effects and neighbouring vegetation. This interplay creates a complex, fluctuating light environment within plant canopies. Shade-intolerant species rely on light cues from competitors to trigger shade avoidance responses, ensuring access to light for photosynthesis. While research often uses controlled growth chambers with steady light to study shade avoidance responses, the influence of light fluctuations in real-world settings remains unclear. This review examines the dynamic light environments found in woodlands, grasslands, and crops. We explore how plants respond to some fluctuations but not others, analyse the potential reasons for these differences, and discuss the possible molecular mechanisms regulating this sensitivity. We propose that studying shade avoidance responses under fluctuating light conditions offers a valuable tool to explore the intricate regulatory network behind them.

Indexed as

LightPlant Physiological PhenomenaCrops, AgriculturalPhotosynthesisCryptochromelightflecksphotosensory receptorsphytochromesunflecksUVR8

Identifiers

PMID39101508
PMCPMC11805590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.