ArticleDiabetology international2024
The relationship between DASC-8 categories and the effectiveness of education on insulin self-injection techniques in elderly patients with diabetes.
Article in Diabetology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Education on insulin self-injection techniques is important for good glycemic control, but its effectiveness in some elderly patients is limited due to loss of cognitive function and impaired activities of daily living. We hypothesized that classification using the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-based Integrated Care System 8-items (DASC-8) would help identify elderly patients with diabetes who effectively learn self-injection techniques. Methods: Diabetes patients aged ≥ 65 years who used a self-injection insulin pen were administered the DASC-8 and a questionnaire to evaluate insulin self-injection techniques, and then received technical education. The questionnaire was administered again 4 months later, and patients were classified into the education-effective and education-ineffective groups. The achievement of HbA1c targets defined for each patient according to guidelines based on DASC-8 category was examined over 12 months. Results: 76 Japanese patients (median age 72.0 years and 53.9% female) with DASC-8 categories I (n = 55), II (n = 13), and III (n = 8) were enrolled. In the education-effective group, the percentage of patients in category I was significantly higher than that of patients in category II or III (92.0% to 23.8%, P < 0.001). Category I was independently associated with education effectiveness (odds ratio 14.50, 95% confidence interval: 2.110-100.0, P = 0.007). Category I patients in the education-effective group showed significantly improved achievement of target HbA1c from baseline to the 12th month (from 27.6% to 62.1%, P = 0.008). Conclusions: The DASC-8 was a useful indicator for identifying elderly patients who would benefit from education on self-injection techniques. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-024-00710-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.