ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Real-world usage and effectiveness of recombinant factor VIII/factor IX Fc in hemophilia A/B: final data from the 24-month, prospective, noninterventional PREVENT study in Germany.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03055611 (A 24-month Prospective, Non-interventional, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Real-World Usage and Effectiveness of Elocta and Alprolix in Patients With Haemophilia A or B), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 24-month Prospective, Non-interventional, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Real-World Usage and Effectiveness of Elocta and Alprolix in Patients With Haemophilia A or B
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post Hoc Analyses of A-SURE and PREVENT Confirm the Effectiveness of rFVIIIFc Prophylaxis Across All Ages, BMIs, Severities, and Inhibitor Histories.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Comparing Real-World Outcomes of Prophylaxis with Extended Half-life Factor IX (rIX-FP vs. rFIXFc and N9-GP) for Haemophilia B: An Analysis of Medical Chart Data from Germany.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Real-World Prophylaxis Outcomes with rIX-FP and rFIXFc for Males with Hemophilia B: Pooled Analysis of Medical Chart Data from Germany and Italy.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Superior Prophylactic Effectiveness of a Recombinant FVIIIFc Over Standard Half-Life FVIII in Hemophilia A: A-SURE Study.European journal of haematology · 2025Observational
- FAR-BENE Study: pharmacoeconomics and well-being in hemophilia. Monitoring outcomes in light of pharmaceutical expenditure with focus on patients undergoing therapeutic switch.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Real-world experience with efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor [F]VIII Fc fusion protein [rFVIIIFc]) and eftrenonacog alfa (a recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein [rFIXFc]) is needed to bridge evidence gaps. Objectives: To describe rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc usage and effectiveness over a 24-month prospective period. Methods: PREVENT (NCT03055611), a noninterventional study across 25 German hemophilia treatment centers, enrolled previously treated persons with hemophilia A and B (all ages/severities) on individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis before/at enrollment. Primary endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR), injection frequency (IF), and factor consumption (FC). Additionally, up to 12 months of retrospective FVIII/FIX data were collected. Physician and patient satisfaction, and safety outcomes were also assessed. Results: Overall, 150 patients received ≥1 rFVIIIFc dose and 47 patients received ≥1 rFIXFc dose, with median prospective follow-up of 20.6 and 21.0 months, respectively. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc demonstrated low median ABR (0.5/1.7), annualized IF (121.8/52.2 injections/y), and FC (4611.7/2423.9 IU/kg) in line with product labels. Compared with previous FVIII/FIX, there was a 56.0% reduction in ABR for rFVIIIFc (rate ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64), with no change for rFIXFc (rate ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31); rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc reduced annualized IF (rFVIIIFc, mean difference, -31.7; 95% CI, -40.3 to -23.1; rFIXFc, mean difference, -37.3; 95% CI, -46.9 to -27.8), while FC remained stable (rFVIIIFc, +374.1; 95% CI, +46.8 to +701.3; rFIXFc, +503.9; 95% CI, +95.4 to +912.4). Most physicians and patients were satisfied or highly satisfied with rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc were well tolerated, with no inhibitor development or treatment-related serious adverse events. Conclusion: Real-world PREVENT data complement phase 3 trials and show that individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis provided stable bleed protection with low IF and maintained FC. Compared with previous FVIII, ABR was considerably reduced with rFVIIIFc, with stable annualized FC. For rFIXFc, bleed protection was maintained vs previous FIX while reducing annualized IF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.