ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
The management of tarsal tunnel syndrome: A scoping review.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Outcomes after Surgical Decompression for Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2026Article
- [Functional Outcomes after Surgical Decompression for Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tarsal tunnel syndrome, also known as posterior tibial neuralgia, is a compressive neuropathy of the posterior tibial nerve or one of its divisions (calcaneal, lateral plantar or medial plantar nerve) within the tarsal tunnel. This scoping review aims to systematically map and summarise current literature regarding the management of tarsal tunnel syndrome. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Medline and Cinahl were searched using the terms 'tarsal tunnel', 'syndrome', 'entrapment', 'compression', 'posterior tibial', 'neuropathy' and 'neuralgia. Two stage title abstract screening was performed. Observational studies reporting the outcome of treatment of tarsal tunnel syndrome were included. Results: A total of 32 studies were included in the review. Excellent or good results are seen in 75.3 % of cases, with the remainder (24.7 %) achieving fair or poor outcomes. Factors which may influence outcome include patient age, symptom duration, aetiology, co-morbidities, pre-treatment symptom severity and nerve fibrosis. Conclusions: Although favourable outcomes are seen in the majority of cases, poor results are not uncommon. A range of prognostic factors are identified; however, firm conclusions cannot be drawn from the findings of individual low-quality studies. Further research in identifying prognostic factors may aid in clinical decision making and management of patient expectations. Level of evidence: Level IV Scoping review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.