Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39101022›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2024

Polysplenia with situs inversus totalis, azygos continuation of the inferior vena cava, and duplication of the superior vena cava in a healthy adult: A case report.

Rahman Ladak, William Magnuson

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rahman LadakDepartment of Undergraduate Medical Education, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
William MagnusonDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polysplenia syndrome is an embryological disorder whereby the usual left-right asymmetry of thoracic and abdominal viscera fails to develop. It is a rare entity, estimated to occur at a frequency of 1 in 40,000, and is often associated with cardiac and biliary abnormalities. More than 75% of patients die before the age of 5 years, and even in the absence of cardiac anomalies, only 5%-10% of patients are expected to survive into adulthood without complications. Although polysplenia syndrome encompasses a wide range of anatomic abnormalities, there is no single pathognomonic feature. Hence, the prognosis of patients with polysplenia depends on their anatomy, thus necessitating radiology in their management. Here we present a case of a 56-year-old man with polysplenia syndrome and situs inversus totalis. This presentation is atypical because polysplenia is usually considered a form of situs ambiguus, and cases with situs inversus totalis are exceedingly rare. Also noted in our patient are variations in the great vessels, including aortic arch branches and the venae cavae which are features not typically associated with either polysplenia syndrome or situs inversus totalis. The patient is healthy and asymptomatic at baseline, with his diagnosis being made incidentally. Our case report is the first to describe this unique combination of cardiothoracic and cardiovascular anatomy. It also emphasizes the importance of radiologists in caring for patients with laterality defects. As these disorders are uncommon, more data on their anatomic variations may help provide better medical care to this patient population.

Indexed as

Azygos veinHeterotaxy syndromeInferior vena cavaPolysplenia syndromeSitus inversusSuperior vena cava

Identifiers

PMID39101022
PMCPMC11295447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.