ArticleIntegrated pharmacy research & practice2024
Outcomes of Community Pharmacy Interventions on Patients with Medicines Under Additional Monitoring.
Article in Integrated pharmacy research & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Empowering citizens to spontaneously report suspected adverse drug reaction: Systematic literature review of interventions and their impact.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of Pharmacist-Developed Educational Leaflets for Women's Health: A Pre-Post Study of Knowledge and Perceived Usefulness.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of Additional Monitoring on Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacists' Role: A Scoping Review.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Additional monitoring (AM) medicines include (i) medicines containing a new active substance; (ii) biological medicines; (iii) medicines with conditional approval or authorized in special situations; (iv) medicines which require further studies; (v) medicines that have specific requirements regarding the reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). When AM medicines are marketed, their most common ADRs are known, but safety information is limited because relatively rare ADRs are often not detected in clinical trials. Their AM status warrants real-world studies to identify other safety issues; however, such studies are lacking. Correct use and adherence to dosage regimen by patients are key factors for the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of medicines. The objective of this work was assessing the impact on safety, adherence, use and knowledge (U&K) about medicines and patient's quality of life (QOL), of community pharmacist (CP)-led interventions in a new service focused on AM medicines targeted at three prevalent chronic diseases: diabetes mellitus type 2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease. Patients and Methods: A prospective interventional cohort study was conducted with a 6-month follow-up in 27 community pharmacies (145 patients). Safety, adherence to treatment, patient U&K and QOL were assessed at follow-up visits (months 0, 3 and 6). Results: The number of detected ADRs was 163 with 41 patients referred to the doctor. At baseline, 24.1% of the patients were non-adherent, mainly due to unintentional causes. After six months and 130 interventions by CPs on adherence, a significant reduction to lower than 5.8% was achieved. The inadequate U&K of medicines also decreased, from 47.6% to 7.9% after 182 interventions. Also, the patient's QOL improved. Conclusion: A new patient-centered pharmacy service provides some evidence on the important role of CP in assisting the proper and safe use of AM medicines, improving patient health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.