Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100960›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2024

An Interactive Allyship and Privilege Workshop for Trainees in Medicine.

Janette Tang, Rebecca Chen, LaMisha Hill Weller, Christy Boscardin, Odinakachukwu Ehie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janette TangFourth-Year Medical Student, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.
Rebecca ChenFourth-Year Medical Student, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.
LaMisha Hill WellerAdjunct Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.
Christy BoscardinProfessor, Department of Medicine and Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.
Odinakachukwu EhieAssociate Professor, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-8436-8897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite growing efforts to increase diversity in recruitment and to teach principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), representation of individuals underrepresented in medicine continues to fall short. This demonstrates a need for efforts that target the work environment and culture to increase retention alongside existing recruitment initiatives. We designed this interactive allyship workshop with a focus on building skills necessary for being an ally that has been missing in existing allyship curricula. Methods: This workshop was led by multidepartmental faculty with experience in DEI training. Participants engaged in a number of interactive activities to reflect on their own identities and privilege and practiced ways to engage in difficult conversations. Prior to the workshop, participants completed a survey that was repeated at the workshop's completion to evaluate their perspective change and understanding of allyship. We also collected responses to a self-reflective exercise during the workshop. Results: Participants included 68 anesthesia and surgery attendees, 53 of whom (78%) completed the postsurvey. Participants strongly agreed that this workshop was important to the workplace and medical training. Themes from the self-reflective exercises included endorsement of sponsorship and mentorship activities, community support, and advocacy. Discussion: Interactive skill-building activities are important and effective at helping trainees develop as allies. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess longitudinal knowledge retention and translation into behavioral change to create a more inclusive and supportive work environment.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducationCultural DiversityHumansMentorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAllyshipDiversityEquityInclusionPowerPrivilegeProgram EvaluationSelf-Assessment

Identifiers

PMID39100960
PMCPMC11294452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.