Relationship between exposure to fine particulate matter and cardiovascular risk factors and the modifying effect of socioeconomic status: a cross-sectional study in Beijing, China.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The association between air pollution and cardiovascular health in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: cross-sectional and prospective analyses.Scientific reports · 2025
   Article
2. Vulnerability characteristics and adaptation strategies of public health systems in different regions of China.Frontiers in public health · 2025
   Review
3. Association Between Social Determinants of Health and Cancer Risk in Middle-Aged and Older Chinese Adults: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Cohort Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as