Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100952›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2024

C-reactive protein point-of-care testing in primary care-broader implementation needed to combat antimicrobial resistance.

Carl Llor, Andreas Plate, Lars Bjerrum, Ivan Gentile, Hasse Melbye, Annamaria Staiano, Oliver van Hecke, Jan Y Verbakel, Rogier Hopstaken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carl Llor *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Andreas Plate *Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lars BjerrumCenter for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ivan GentileDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Hasse MelbyeGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Annamaria StaianoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Oliver van HeckeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan Y VerbakelNIHR Community Healthcare Medtech and IVD Cooperative, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rogier Hopstaken *GP Practice De Kuil, Hapert, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents the perspective of an international group of experts, providing an overview of existing models and policies and guidance to facilitate a proper and sustainable implementation of C-reactive protein point-of-care testing (CRP POCT) to support antibiotic prescribing decisions for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) with the aim to tackle antimicrobial resistance (AMR). AMR threatens to render life-saving antibiotics ineffective and is already costing millions of lives and billions of Euros worldwide. AMR is strongly correlated with the volume of antibiotics used. Most antibiotics are prescribed in primary care, mostly for RTIs, and are often unnecessary. CRP POCT is an available tool and has been proven to safely and cost-effectively reduce antibiotic prescribing for RTIs in primary care. Though established in a few European countries during several years, it has still not been implemented in many European countries. Due to the complexity of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing behavior, a multifaceted approach is necessary to enable sustainable change. The effect is maximized with clear guidance, advanced communication training for primary care physicians, and delayed antibiotic prescribing strategies. CRP POCT should be included in professional guidelines and implemented together with complementary strategies. Adequate reimbursement needs to be provided, and high-quality, and primary care-friendly POCT organization and performance must be enabled. Data gathering, sharing, and discussion as incentivization for proper behaviors should be enabled. Public awareness should be increased, and healthcare professionals' awareness and understanding should be ensured. Impactful use is achieved when all stakeholders join forces to facilitate proper implementation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinPoint-of-Care TestingPrimary Health CareRespiratory Tract InfectionsEuropeHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive Proteinanti-bacterial agentscomplementary strategiesC-reactive proteindrug resistance microbialimplementationinappropriate prescribingpoint-of-care testingrespiratory tract infections

Identifiers

PMID39100952
PMCPMC11294078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.