ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Effect Analysis of the HFMEA Model Applied in Sputum Specimen Management Among Patients with Tuberculosis.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Surgical Specimen Chain Management Information System on specimen management in operating room: a pilot Quasi-Experimental study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Applying healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to enhance patient-controlled analgesia in acute post anesthesia pain management.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Accurate diagnosis is very important to block the transmission of tuberculosis. The quality of sputum culture affects the diagnostic accuracy. The quality of sputum samples is not optimistic. Therefore, this study investigated whether health care failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA) can improve specimen quality and detection efficiency in sputum specimen management in tuberculosis departments. Methods: This study is a non-randomized controlled trial study. A convenience sampling method was used to select 110 patients who visited the Department of Tuberculosis of the Second Hospital of Nanjing from September to November 2022 and December 2022 to February 2023 as the control group and the experimental group. Control groups followed standard operating procedures for sputum specimen collection. In the experimental group, HFMEA model was used to control the quality on this basis. After 3 months of intervention, the qualified rate and positive detection rate of sputum samples were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 634 sputum specimens were included in the experimental group and 647 in the control group. Compared with the control group, the qualification rate of sputum specimens was higher in the experimental group (84.54% vs 79.13%); the positive detection rates of the X-Pert assay (27.88% vs 16.19%), sputum culture (20.29% vs 12.68%), and sputum smear (22.29% vs 15.81%) were all higher in the experimental group (all Conclusion: The application of the HFMEA model in sputum specimen management can effectively improve specimen quality and positive detection rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.