Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100795›Full record

ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2024

First confirmed case of hydatid disease of the male breast: A case report.

Humsheer Singh Sethi, Satya Mohapatra, Adyakinkar Panda, Chayasmita Mali

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Humsheer Singh SethiDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2722-0148
Satya MohapatraDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Adyakinkar PandaDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Chayasmita MaliDepartment of Pathology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hydatid disease of the male breast has not been documented in literature to date. Case report: We present a case of a 46-year old male patient who presented with a painful breast lump for 1 year. On imaging, it was suspicious for hydatid disease of the breast and was successfully diagnosed preoperatively on fine-needle aspiration cytology and histopathology as hydatid disease of the breast. Discussion: Incidence of hydatid disease of the breast contributes to a minute number of total cases of hydatid disease. Male breast hydatid disease was unknown prior to this report. We did find similarities in the imaging features of our case and the ones described for female breasts. On ultrasonography, we found it analogous to the 'water-lily' sign which has been described in hepatic hydatic cysts. Conclusion: Keeping hydatid disease as a differential in the setting of a suspicious breast mass even in a male patient proved to be rewarding as it negated the need for further cross-sectional imaging and a definitive diagnosis could be sought based on the fine-needle aspiration cytology and histopathological findings.

Indexed as

echinococcosishydatid cystMale breast hydatid diseasewater-lily sign

Identifiers

PMID39100795
PMCPMC11292929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.