ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2024
Integrated use of contrast-enhanced and grey-scale ultrasound in assigning American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System scores for characterisation of thyroid nodules: A prospective observational study.
Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with other imaging techniques in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Doppler-Scintigraphy Combination with Thyroxine Profiling Enhances Diagnostic Accuracy of Thyroid Lesions: A 144-Patient Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Dual-database Bibliometric Analysis Combined with Gephi-based Network Visualization of Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Identification and Diagnosis of Thyroid Space-occupying Lesions.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The advent and increased use of high-resolution ultrasonography has resulted in improved detection of thyroid nodules. Even with the use of various Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System, accurate imaging diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules has been suboptimal, which necessitated use of newer modalities like contrast-enhanced ultrasonography alone and in combination for this purpose. Although the combined use of various Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has turned out to be accurate in many studies, the ideal way to integrate contrast-enhanced ultrasonography into the Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System algorithm is under-investigated. Purpose: To estimate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differentiating benign and malignant nodules alone and in combination. To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in re-categorisation of Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 and Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System 4 thyroid nodules. Materials and methods: This was a prospective cohort study performed in a tertiary care university-based hospital for 3 years. Adult patients with clinical or previous sonographic diagnosis of thyroid nodules were selected. Each of the nodules were assessed using ultrasonography and categorised using American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System criteria. The lesion was then assessed for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography features. The final diagnosis of the nodules was made using fine needle aspiration cytology. The diagnostic accuracy in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules for each of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography alone and in combination was assessed. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules categorised as Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 and Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System 4 was also assessed. Results: American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System had a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of 86.6%, 54.5%, 17.4%, 97.3% and 57.7%, respectively, in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography had a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of 86.6%, 95.4%, 67.9%, 98.4% and 94.4%, respectively, in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography had sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of 93.3%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 99.2% and 99.3%, respectively, in re-categorisation of Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 and Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System 4 nodules. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can play a key role in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules which are categorised as indeterminate on grey-scale ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.