Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100750›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2024

The complex effects of modern oncogenic environments on the fitness, evolution and conservation of wildlife species.

Antoine M Dujon, Beata Ujvari, Sophie Tissot, Jordan Meliani, Océane Rieu, Nikita Stepanskyy, Rodrigo Hamede, Jácint Tokolyi, Aurora Nedelcu, Frédéric Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Consequences of Cancer on ZebrafishEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antoine M DujonSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University Waurn Ponds Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-9156
Beata UjvariSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University Waurn Ponds Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2391-2988
Sophie TissotCREEC/CANECEV (CREES), MIVEGEC, Unité Mixte de Recherches, IRD 224-CNRS 5290-Université de Montpellier Montpellier France.
Jordan MelianiCREEC/CANECEV (CREES), MIVEGEC, Unité Mixte de Recherches, IRD 224-CNRS 5290-Université de Montpellier Montpellier France.
Océane RieuCREEC/CANECEV (CREES), MIVEGEC, Unité Mixte de Recherches, IRD 224-CNRS 5290-Université de Montpellier Montpellier France.
Nikita StepanskyyCREEC/CANECEV (CREES), MIVEGEC, Unité Mixte de Recherches, IRD 224-CNRS 5290-Université de Montpellier Montpellier France.
Rodrigo HamedeSchool of Natural Sciences University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia.
Jácint TokolyiDepartment of Evolutionary Zoology, MTA-DE "Momentum" Ecology, Evolution and Developmental Biology Research Group University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary.
Aurora NedelcuDepartment of Biology University of new Brunswick Fredericton New Brunswick Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7517-2419
Frédéric ThomasSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University Waurn Ponds Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-1978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence indicates that human activities are causing cancer rates to rise in both human and wildlife populations. This is due to the inability of ancestral anti-cancer defences to cope with modern environmental risks. The evolutionary mismatch between modern oncogenic risks and evolved cancer defences has far-reaching effects on various biological aspects at different timeframes, demanding a comprehensive study of the biology and evolutionary ecology of the affected species. Firstly, the increased activation of anti-cancer defences leads to excessive energy expenditure, affecting other biological functions and potentially causing health issues like autoimmune diseases. Secondly, tumorigenesis itself can impact important fitness-related parameters such as competitiveness, predator evasion, resistance to parasites, and dispersal capacity. Thirdly, rising cancer risks can influence the species' life-history traits, often favoring early reproduction to offset fitness costs associated with cancer. However, this strategy has its limits, and it may not ensure the sustainability of the species if cancer risks continue to rise. Lastly, some species may evolve additional anti-cancer defences, with uncertain consequences for their biology and future evolutionary path. In summary, we argue that the effects of increased exposure to cancer-causing substances on wildlife are complex, ranging from immediate responses to long-term evolutionary changes. Understanding these processes, especially in the context of conservation biology, is urgently needed.

Indexed as

ecotoxicologyenvironmental changeneoplasmpollutionselective pressure

Identifiers

PMID39100750
PMCPMC11294924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.