Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100745›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical signals and sensors2024

Tensor Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

Farnaz Sedighin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Farnaz SedighinMedical Image and Signal Processing Research Center, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, tensors have become increasingly attractive in different aspects of signal and image processing areas. The main reason is the inefficiency of matrices in representing and analyzing multimodal and multidimensional datasets. Matrices cannot preserve the multidimensional correlation of elements in higher-order datasets and this highly reduces the effectiveness of matrix-based approaches in analyzing multidimensional datasets. Besides this, tensor-based approaches have demonstrated promising performances. These together, encouraged researchers to move from matrices to tensors. Among different signal and image processing applications, analyzing biomedical signals and images is of particular importance. This is due to the need for extracting accurate information from biomedical datasets which directly affects patient's health. In addition, in many cases, several datasets have been recorded simultaneously from a patient. A common example is recording electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of a patient with schizophrenia. In such a situation, tensors seem to be among the most effective methods for the simultaneous exploitation of two (or more) datasets. Therefore, several tensor-based methods have been developed for analyzing biomedical datasets. Considering this reality, in this paper, we aim to have a comprehensive review on tensor-based methods in biomedical image analysis. The presented study and classification between different methods and applications can show the importance of tensors in biomedical image enhancement and open new ways for future studies.

Indexed as

Biomedical image enhancementtensor decompositiontensor networks

Identifiers

PMID39100745
PMCPMC11296571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.